ECONOMIC IMPACT OF CONFLICT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODERN WORLD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2413-9971/2026-60-16Keywords:
international trade, war, sanctions, globalization, protectionism, supply chains, geopolitics, security, energy, regional integration, re-globalizationAbstract
The aim of the study is to systematically identify and explain how contemporary conflicts (primarily the Russian-Ukrainian war, US-China geopolitical competition, and crises in key logistics hubs) are transforming the global economy through channels of international trade, investment, supply chains, energy, food security, and global governance institutions, and to outline possible strategies for adapting to the conditions of geoeconomic fragmentation. A structural-functional approach, comparative analysis, synthesis of scientific sources, and analysis of official statistics and analytical reports from UNCTAD, IMF, WTO, Eurostat, World Bank, and Institute for Economics & Peace were applied. The study covers the period 2020–2026, combining quantitative data (trade dynamics, FDI, GDP loss estimates, violence costs) with qualitative policy analysis (sanctions, protectionism, CBAM, RCEP, CPTPP, re-globalization). The study substantiates that the current transformation of the world economy under the influence of conflicts is not temporary, but structural in nature and forms a new model of global interaction, in which security considerations increasingly prevail over the purely economic logic of efficiency. It is found that the slowdown in globalization is accompanied by the institutionalization of protectionism: trade barriers have ceased to be a situational response to crises and have become a permanent element of the economic policy of states, changing the rules of the game for international business. It is proven that geopolitical conflicts no longer simply disrupt individual supply chains, but systematically change the spatial configuration of world trade, forcing countries and companies to restructure routes, partnerships and logistics strategies. The study allowed us to conceptually rethink the economic “price of violence”: conflicts affect not only through direct destruction or military spending, but through the long-term deformation of economic incentives, investment flows and institutions of trust. It is shown that climate and trade instruments (in particular CBAM) perform a dual function: on the one hand, they do not cause a sharp reduction in trade, on the other hand, they gradually change the structure of production and investment in favor of low-carbon technologies. The study allowed to form an integrated strategy for adapting the world economy to the conditions of chronic conflicts, which combines managed re-globalization, the development of mega-regional agreements, “smart” diversification of supply chains and an accelerated transition to a low-carbon economy. The results are useful for government authorities and international organizations in the formation of trade, sanctions, energy and logistics policies; for business - in strategic risk management and restructuring of supply chains; for think tanks and scientists - as an integrated framework for analyzing the interaction of trade, security, investment and climate policy in conditions of geo-economic fragmentation.
References
Offeringa M., McGinley C. How do Red Sea disruptions affect global supply chains. Hermes Investment Insights. 25 Jan. 2024. URL: https://www.hermes-investment.com/uk/en/institutions/insights/alternatives/how-do-red-sea-disruptions-affect-global-supply-chains/ (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Global Trade Update (January 2026): Top trends redefining global trade in 2026 : UNCTAD/DITC/INF/2025/11. Geneva and New York. 15 Jan. 2026. 22 p. URL: https://unctad.org/publication/global-trade-update-january-2026-top-trends-redefining-global-trade-2026 (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
Institute for Economics & Peace. Global Peace Index 2025. London: Institute for Economics & Peace. 2025. 136 p. URL: https://www.visionofhumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Global-Peace-Index-2025- (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
Hamza T., Ben Haj Hamida H., Mili M., Sami M. High inflation during Russia–Ukraine war and financial market interaction: Evidence from C-Vine Copula and SETAR models. Research in International Business and Finance. 2024. Vol. 70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102384 (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
U T. S.-C., Lin Y., Wang Y. The impact of the Russia–Ukraine war on volatility spillovers. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2024. Vol. 93. Art. 103194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103194 (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
Sedrakyan G. S. Ukraine war-induced sanctions against Russia: Consequences on transition economies. Journal of Policy Modeling. 2022. Vol. 44, iss. 5. P. 863–885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2022.08.003 (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
Zhang Y.-T., Li M.-Y., Zhou W.-X. Impact of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict on International Staple Agrifood Trade Networks. Foods. 2024. Vol. 13, no. 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13132134 (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
Kancs d’Artis. Uncertainty of supply chains: Risk and ambiguity. The World Economy. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13534 (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
Bednarski Ł., Subramanian N., Roscoe S., Blome C. Geopolitical rivalry over strategically important industries: understanding the effects on global supply chain design. The International Journal of Logistics Management. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2025.2570203 (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
López C., Morales-Contreras M. F., Langella I. M., Alonso-Monge J. Modeling supply chain disruptions due to geopolitical reasons: A systematic literature review. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2025. Vol. 202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104290 (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
Lyzun M., Vitálišová K., Borseková K. Transformation of trade flows between the EU and Ukraine in the conditions of increasing security risks. Journal of European Economy. 2024. Vol. 23, no. 2 (89). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2024.02.289 (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
Eurostat. World trade in goods and services – an overview. Eurostat Statistics Explained. 2024. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=World_trade_in_goods_and_services_-_an_overview (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. World Investment Report 2025: Chapter 1 – International investment trends. Geneva and New York: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2025. 76 p. URL: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2025_ch01_en.pdf (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Global Trade Update (January 2026): Top Trends Redefining Global Trade in 2026: UNCTAD/DITC/INF/2025/11. Geneva and New York: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 15 Jan. 2026. 22 p. (UNCTAD Global Trade Update Series). URL: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ditcinf2025d11_en.pdf (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
The Sofia Globe staff. EU imports from Russia dropped 85% between Q1 2022 and Q4 2024. The Sofia Globe. 24 Feb. 2025. URL: https://sofiaglobe.com/2025/02/24/eu-imports-from-russia-dropped-85-between-q1-2022-and-q4-2024/ (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
International Monetary Fund. The High Cost of Global Economic Fragmentation. 2023. URL: https://www.imf.org/en/blogs/articles/2023/08/28/the-high-cost-of-global-economic-fragmentation (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
World Trade Organization. World Trade Report 2023: Re-globalization for a secure, inclusive and sustainable future. Geneva: World Trade Organization, 2023. 154 p. URL: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/wtr23_e.htm (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. RCEP information page. APEC Research. URL: https://research.apec.org/rcep/ (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
International Institute for Sustainable Development. EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Bigger trade implications. IISD Explainers. 1 Aug. 2023. URL: https://www.iisd.org/articles/explainer/eu-carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism-bigger-trade-implications (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
Федик М. В. Економічна інтеграція та співпраця в умовах глобалізації. Публічне управління та політика. 2025. Вип. 1(5). С. 21–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2025.1.03 (дата звернення: 10.01.2026)
Offeringa M., McGinley C. (2024). How do Red Sea disruptions affect global supply chains. Hermes Investment Insights, 25 Jan. 2024. Available at: https://www.hermes-investment.com/uk/en/institutions/insights/alternatives/how-do-red-sea-disruptions-affect-global-supply-chains/ (accessed January 10, 2026)
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2026). Global Trade Update (January 2026): Top trends redefining global trade in 2026: UNCTAD/DITC/INF/2025/11. Geneva and New York: UNCTAD. 22 p. Available at: https://unctad.org/publication/global-trade-update-january-2026-top-trends-redefining-global-trade-2026 (accessed January 10, 2026)
Institute for Economics & Peace (2025). Global Peace Index 2025. London: Institute for Economics & Peace. 136 p. Available at: https://www.visionofhumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Global-Peace-Index-2025- (accessed January 10, 2026)
Hamza T., Ben Haj Hamida H., Mili M., Sami M. (2024). High inflation during Russia–Ukraine war and financial market interaction: Evidence from C-Vine Copula and SETAR models. Research in International Business and Finance, vol. 70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102384 (accessed January 10, 2026)
U T. S.-C., Lin Y., Wang Y. (2024). The impact of the Russia–Ukraine war on volatility spillovers. International Review of Financial Analysis, vol. 93, art. 103194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103194 (accessed January 10, 2026)
Sedrakyan G. S. (2022). Ukraine war-induced sanctions against Russia: Consequences on transition economies. Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 44, is. 5, pp. 863–885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2022.08.003 (accessed January 10, 2026)
Zhang Y.-T., Li M.-Y., Zhou W.-X. (2024). Impact of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict on International Staple Agrifood Trade Networks. Foods, vol. 13, no. 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13132134 (accessed January 10, 2026)
Kancs d’Artis (2023). Uncertainty of supply chains: Risk and ambiguity. The World Economy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13534 (accessed January 10, 2026)
Bednarski Ł., Subramanian N., Roscoe S., Blome C. (2025). Geopolitical rivalry over strategically important industries: understanding the effects on global supply chain design. The International Journal of Logistics Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2025.2570203 (accessed January 10, 2026)
López C., Morales-Contreras M. F., Langella I. M., Alonso-Monge J. (2025). Modeling supply chain disruptions due to geopolitical reasons: A systematic literature review. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104290 (accessed January 10, 2026)
Lyzun M., Vitálišová K., Borseková K. (2024). Transformation of trade flows between the EU and Ukraine in the conditions of increasing security risks. Journal of European Economy, vol. 23, no. 2 (89). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2024.02.289 (accessed January 10, 2026)
Eurostat (2024). World trade in goods and services – an overview. Eurostat Statistics Explained. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=World_trade_in_goods_and_services_-_an_overview (accessed January 10, 2026)
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2025). World Investment Report 2025: Chapter 1 – International investment trends. Geneva and New York: UNCTAD. 76 p. Available at: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2025_ch01_en.pdf (accessed January 10, 2026)
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2026). Global Trade Update (January 2026): Top Trends Redefining Global Trade in 2026: UNCTAD/DITC/INF/2025/11. Geneva and New York: UNCTAD. 22 p. (UNCTAD Global Trade Update Series). Available at: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ditcinf2025d11_en.pdf (accessed January 10, 2026)
The Sofia Globe staff (2025). EU imports from Russia dropped 85% between Q1 2022 and Q4 2024. The Sofia Globe, 24 Feb. 2025. Available at: https://sofiaglobe.com/2025/02/24/eu-imports-from-russia-dropped-85-between-q1-2022-and-q4-2024/ (accessed January 10, 2026)
International Monetary Fund (2023). The High Cost of Global Economic Fragmentation. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/blogs/articles/2023/08/28/the-high-cost-of-global-economic-fragmentation (accessed January 10, 2026)
World Trade Organization (2023). World Trade Report 2023: Re-globalization for a secure, inclusive and sustainable future. Geneva: WTO. 154 p. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/wtr23_e.htm (accessed January 10, 2026)
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (n.d.). RCEP information page. APEC Research. URL: https://research.apec.org/rcep/ (accessed January 10, 2026)
International Institute for Sustainable Development (2023). EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Bigger trade implications. IISD Explainers, 1 Aug. 2023. Available at: https://www.iisd.org/articles/explainer/eu-carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism-bigger-trade-implications (accessed January 10, 2026)
Fedyk, M. (2025). Economichna integratia ta spivpracia v umovax globalizatsii. [Economic integration and cooperation in the context of globalization] Publichne upravlinia ta polituka, vol. 1(5), рр. 21–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-2498/2025.1.03 (accessed January 10, 2026)
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Т.П. Яхно

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.