DEVELOPMENT OF THE UKRAINIAN-LANGUAGE VERSION OF THE TEAM EFFECTIVENESS QUESTIONNAIRE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2077-6594.4.0.2020.220376Keywords:
questionnaire, translation, interdisciplinary team, validity, reliability, patientsAbstract
The aim of the study was to provide an informational component of management decisions to assess the effectiveness of interdisciplinary teams in the provision of medical care to patients.
Materials and methods: the original «Team Effectiveness Questionnaire» developed by London Leadership Academy, National Health Service was used; 119 completed questionnaires of participants in pilot studies; scientific sources (20 items); the following methods were used: logical-structural, comparative analysis; expert assessments; sociological; medical and statistical.
Results: a Ukrainian-language version of the «Team effectiveness questionnaire» was developed in several stages: two independent direct translations from English into Ukrainian were made; synthesis of two translations and formation of a preliminary final version; two back translations; expert assessment of the final version; two pilot studies. The substantive, external, discriminant validity (t-test value > 1.75 for each statement of the questionnaire with a critical value of 1.75 at n ≥ 25) and internal consistency (Alpha-Cronbach coefficient α = 0.993) of statements in the Ukrainian version of the questionnaire were proved.
Conclusions: the developed Ukrainian-language version of the «Team effectiveness questionnaire» can be used as a tool for providing information to managers in health care institutions in Ukraine.
References
Dubina I. N. Matematicheskiye osnovy empiricheskikh sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh issledovaniy: uchebnoye posobiye. Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. un-ta, 2006. 263 s.
Palamarchuk V. A., Tsvetok D. N., Mazur A. V. Risk-oriyentirovannoye lecheniye papillyarnogo raka shchitovidnoy zhelezy. Klinicheskaya endokrinologiya i endokrinnaya khirurgiya. 2019. № 3 (67). S. 7-13.
Puti sovershenstvovaniya okazaniya meditsinskoy pomoshchi bol'nym tireopatii s soputstvuyushchey patologiyey / Pan'kiv V. I. i dr. Mezhdunarodnyy endokrinologicheskiy zhurnal. 2014. № 7 (63). S. 106-111.
A Guide to Team Development. WHO: веб-сайт. URL: https://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/guidetodevelopment/ en/ (дата звернення: 22.11.2020).
Development and testing of the cancer multidisciplinary team meeting observational tool (MDT-MOT) / Harris Jenny et al. J Qual Health Care. 2016. № 28 (3). P. 332–338. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw030.
Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. Beaton D. E. et al. Spine. 2000. Volume 25. Issue 24. P. 3186-3191.
Hosung Kang. Systematic overview of reviews of instruments that evaluate teamwork in healthcare. 2019. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 6384. URL: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/6384 (дата звернення: 22.11.2020).
Is it worth reorganising cancer services on the basis of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs)? A systematic review of the objectives and organisation of MDTs and their impact on patient outcomes / Prades J. et al. Health Policy. 2015. № 119 (4). Р. 464-74. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.09.006.
John Walters Stephen, Cindy Stern, Suzanne Robertson-Malt. The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments. JBI. Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. № 13 (7):24. DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1846.
Markers for enhancing team cognition in complex environments: the power of team performance diagnosis / Salas E. et al. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. 2007. Vol. 78, № 5. Р. B77–B85.
Melissa Valentine A., Ingrid Nembhard M., Amy Edmondson C. Measuring Teamwork in Health Care Settings. A Review of Survey Instruments. Medical Care. Volume 00, Number 00. 2014. 15 р.
Multidisciplinary teams and ICT: a qualitative study exploring the use of technology and its impact on multidisciplinary team meetings / Janssen A. et al. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018. № 18:444. 10 р. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3242-3.
National Health Service (NHS) London Leadership Academy. Team effectiveness questionnaire. 2014. Веб-сайт. URL: http://www.londonleadingforhealth.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/Team_effectiveness_diagnostic-LAL1.pdf (дата звернення: 22.11.2020).
Policy statement on multidisciplinary cancer care. European Partnership for Action Against Cancer consensus group. Barcelona, Spain. 2014. 14 р.
Recommendations for the Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the DASH & QuickDASH Outcome Measure / Dorcas Beaton, Claire Bombardier, Francis Guillemin, Marcos Bosi Ferraz. Institute for Work & Health: 2002, 2007. 45 р.
Samar Ibrahim El-Morsi; Fatma Gouda Metwally Ibrahim; Ghada Mosaad Mohamed Elghabbour. Team work effectiveness and its relation with transformational leadership as perceived by nurses at Port Said General Hospitals. Port Said Scientific Journal of Nursing. 2020. Article 2, Volume 7, Issue 3. P. 25-41. DOI: 10.21608/pssjn.2020.36626.1043.
Systematic review of the characteristics of brief team interventions to clarify roles and improve functioning in healthcare teams / Kilpatrick K. et al. 2020. PLOS ONE № 15(6): e0234416. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234416.
The effectiveness of interprofessional classroom-based education in medical curricula: A systematic review / Vuurberg G. et al. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice. 2019. № 15:98. Р. 157–167158. DOI 10.1186/s12909-015-0385-3.
The Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) Approach and Quality of Care / Taberna M. et al. Front Oncol. 2020. № 20. P. 10:85. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00085.
Using peer observers to assess the quality of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: a qualitative proof of concept study / Harris Jenny et al. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2014. № 7. P. 355–363.
