ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PROBLEM OF AMBULATORY CARE SENSITIVE CONDITIONS IN UKRAINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24144/2077-6594.2.2020.201618Keywords:
ambulatory care sensitive conditions, hospital discharges, survey of key informantsAbstract
The purpose of the study was to identify the most relevant ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) for the adult population (over 18 years old) in Ukraine (an exhaustive list of 8 to 10 diseases) and to identify the highest priority marker ACSCs as indicators of the effectiveness of primary care (2 to 4 diseases).
Materials and methods. In accordance with the WHO methodological recommendations for assessing ACSC in the European Region, a multistage study adapted to national realities involving 104 key informants – representatives of interested parties: general practitioners, specialists, health managers and a dedicated expert group.. The survey was conducted on a standardized questionnaire for self-analysis of ACSC after a lot of preparatory work to determine the list of ambulatory-sensitive conditions and analyze available statistical information on the hospital discharges.
Results. According to the integrated assessment of statistical data and the opinions of the respondents, the most significant ACSC s in Ukraine that require special attention include: pneumonia, perforated/bleeding ulcer, pyelonephritis (for acute diseases); diabetes, hypertension, angina Pectoris, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma (for chronic diseases); diphtheria, tuberculosis, measles (for Immunization-preventable conditions).
Conclusions. The conception of ACSC in modern conditions does not lose its relevance due to the possibility of strengthening the health systems at the expense of primary care and balancing the needs and measures of prompt response in connection with the threat COVID-19. It has been determined that such ACSCs as pneumonia, diabetes, hypertension, angina pectoris and tuberculosis are the representative markers of the effectiveness of providing PHC in Ukraine.
References
Grabovec’kyj B. Je. Metody ekspertnyh ocinok: teorija, metodologija, naprjamky vykorystannja : monografija. Vinnycja : VNTU, 2010. 171 s. [in Ukrainian].
Lekhan V.N., Kriachkova L.V., Zaiarskyі M.I., Borvinko E.V. Ukrainian version of appropriateness evaluation protocol and criteria of inpatient care duration. World of medicine and biology. 2019; 3(69): 94-100. [in Ukrainian]. DOI 10.26724/2079-8334-2019-3-69-94-100.
Altman D. G. Practical statistics for medical research. London : Chapman and Hall, 1991. 611 р.
Ambulatory care sensitive conditions in Germany. World Health Organization. WHO Regional Offce for Europe: Copenhagen, 2015. 43 р.
Ambulatory care sensitive conditions in Kazakhstan. World Health Organization. WHO Regional Offce for Europe: Copenhagen, 2015. 46 р.
Ambulatory care sensitive conditions in Latvia. World Health Organization. WHO Regional Offce for Europe: Copenhagen, 2015. 34 р.
Ambulatory care sensitive conditions in Portugal. World Health Organization. WHO Regional Offce for Europe: Copenhagen, 2016. 38 р.
Ambulatory care sensitive conditions in the Republic of Moldova. World Health Organization. WHO Regional Offce for Europe: Copenhagen, 2015. 30 р.
Assessing health services delivery performance with hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. World Health Organization. WHO Regional Offce for Europe: Copenhagen, 2016. 43 р.
Bardsley M., Blunt I., Davies S., Dixon J. Is secondary preventive care improving? Observational study of 10-year trends in emergency admissions for conditions amenable to ambulatory care. BMJ Open. 2013. №3:e002007. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002007.
Billings J., Teicholz N. Uninsured patients in District of Columbia hospitals. Health Aff Proj Hope. 1990. №9(4). Р. 158 – 165. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.9.4.158.
Caminal J., Starfeld B., Sánchez E., Casanova.C, Morales M. The role of primary care in preventing ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Eur J Public Health. 2004. №14(3). Р. 246 – 251. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/14.3.246.
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) technical guidance: Maintaining Essential Health Services and Systems. COVID-19: Operational guidance for maintaining essential health services during an outbreak. WHO/2019-nCoV/immunization_services/2020.1. World Health Organization, 2020. 3 р. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331590/WHO-2019-nCoV-immunization_services-2020.1-eng.pdf.
Fleetcroft R., Hardcastle A., Steel N., Price G.M., Purdy S., Lipp A., Myint P.K., Howe A. Does practice analysis agree with the ambulatory care sensitive conditions’ list of avoidable unplanned admissions?: a cross-sectional study in the East of England. BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 28. № 8(4): e020756. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020756.
Hodgson K, Deeny SR, Steventon A Ambulatory care-sensitive conditions: their potential uses and limitations. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2019. №28. Р. 429-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008820.
Purdy S., Griffin T., Salisbury C., Sharp D. Ambulatory care sensitive conditions: terminology and disease coding need to be more specific to aid policy makers and clinicians. Public Health 2009. №123. Р. 169–173. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.11.001.
Vuik S.I., Fontana G., Mayer E, Darzi A. Do hospitalisations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions reflect low access to primary care? An observational cohort study of primary care usage prior to hospitalisation. BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21. №7(8): e015704. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015704.
Zhao F., Doroshenko O., Lekhan V.N., Kriachkova L.V., Goroshko A. Assessment of appropriateness of hospitalisations in Ukraine: analytical framework, method and findings. BMJ Open. 2019. №9: e030081. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030081.