Medical, Social, and Educational Support for Children with Hearing Impairments: The Path to Effective Rehabilitation and Socialization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2077-6594/2025.4/19Keywords:
Pediatric sensorineural hearing loss, hearing impairment, inclusive education, comprehensive rehabilitation, medical and social support, social integrationAbstract
The article presents a study on the effectiveness of an optimized organizational model for the rehabilitation of children with hearing impairments. The proposed model combines medical, social, and educational services through face-to-face, outpatient, and remote interventions. A total of 224 children aged 6–10 years participated, divided into two equal groups: one received rehabilitation under the new comprehensive program, while the other followed standard procedures. Over 12 months, assessments included physical, speech, cognitive, psycho-emotional, and social-educational parameters. The purpose: to optimize the rehabilitation system for children with hearing impairments by improving the organizational model of medical, social, and educational support, enhancing recovery effectiveness, quality of life, and social integration. Materials and methods. The study applied organizational-legal, historical, content analysis, and structural-organizational modeling methods. Sociological tools, such as questionnaires and interviews with parents and teachers, were used. Statistical analysis employed Student’s t-test, χ², and Microsoft Excel and Statistica 6.0 software. Results. Children who participated in the new rehabilitation program showed greater improvement in auditory perception, speech intelligibility, vocabulary, fine motor skills, and emotional stability compared to the standard group. They also demonstrated higher confidence, social engagement, and academic success. The use of cochlear implants and active family involvement enhanced rehabilitation outcomes, while barriers included limited access in rural areas and a shortage of specialists. Conclusions. The integrated, family-centered model proved more effective than traditional approaches, improving functional, emotional, and social development. Broader implementation and long-term evaluation are recommended.
References
World Health Organization. Deafness and hearing loss: fact sheet [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss.
Grey B, Deutchki EK, Lund EA, Werfel KL. Impact of meeting early hearing detection and intervention benchmarks on spoken language. J Early Interv. 2021;43(3):105381512110252. DOI: 10.1177/10538151211025210.
Warner-Czyz AD, Crow S, Gohmert A, Williams S, Romero M. Barriers to follow-up in early hearing detection and intervention programs. Perspect ASHA Spec Groups. 2024;9(5):1–17. DOI: 10.1044/2023_persp-23-00080.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. Hearing detection and intervention: program connects deaf or hard-of-hearing infants and children to services, but actions needed to improve access. Washington (DC): GAO; 2025. Report No.: GAO-25-XXX.
Cejas I, Barker DH, Petruzzello E, Sarangoulis CM, Quittner AL. Cochlear implantation and educational and quality-of-life outcomes in adolescence. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;149(6):e231327. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.1327.
Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Cushing SL. Long-term language, educational, and quality-of-life outcomes in adolescents after childhood cochlear implantation. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;149(6):e231329. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.1329.
Jønsberg AC, Hovland T, Busch T, Wie OB, Torkildsen JV. Language interventions for school-aged children who are d/deaf and hard of hearing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2025;68(4):1–22. DOI: 10.1044/2025_jslhr-24-00456.
Aldemir H, Solís-Campos A, Saldaña D, Rodríguez-Ortiz IR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of vocabulary interventions for deaf/hard of hearing children and adolescents. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023;66(7):1–27. DOI: 10.1044/2023_jslhr-22-00570.
Naugle K, Stephans J, Lazar A, Kearns JM, Coulthurst S, Tebb KP, Chan DK. Teletherapy to address language disparities in deaf and hard-of-hearing children: study protocol for an inclusive multicentre clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2024;14(8):e089118. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089118.
Retamal-Walter F, Waite M, Scarinci N. Development and validation of an observational tool to measure engagement in telepractice early intervention. Disabil Rehabil. 2024;46(22):1–12. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2432921.
Shin Y, Park EJ, Lee A. Early intervention for children with developmental disabilities and their families via telehealth: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:e66442. DOI: 10.2196/66442.
Aanondsen CM, Jozefiak T, Lydersen S, Heiling K, Rimehaug T. Deaf and hard-of-hearing children and adolescents’ mental health, quality of life and communication. BMC Psychiatry. 2023;23(1):287. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-04787-9.
de Jong TJ, van der Schroeff MP, Stapersma L, Vroegop JL. Impact of auditory functioning and language proficiency on psychosocial difficulties in children and adolescents with hearing loss: a systematic review. Int J Audiol. 2023;62(10):1–11. DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2261074.
Keerthan KS, Gunjawate DR, Ravi R, Kumar K. Exploring teacher knowledge and attitudes towards the inclusion of children with hearing impairment in mainstream education: a systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2025;190:112255. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2025.112255.
Akshatha S, Bhat M, Ravi R. Attitude and perception of teachers towards inclusion of children with hearing impairment in mainstream schools in Karnataka, India. Deaf Educ Int. 2024;26(3):1–20. DOI: 10.1080/14643154.2024.2389592.







