VAGINAL MICROBIOTA: CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE AND MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN WOMEN WITH INTERMEDIATE NUGENT PROFILES (4–6)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-7684/2025-4-17Keywords:
Nugent 4–6, vaginal microbiota, Lactobacillus iners, bacterial vaginosis, management strategy, CST-IV, probioticsAbstract
Introduction. A Nugent score of 4–6 is not diagnostic for bacterial vaginosis (BV) but reflects vaginal microbiota instability and may indicate an unfavorable prognosis. Molecular studies show that BV-related microbial patterns occur even at intermediate morphotypes, highlighting the need for careful evaluation. Aim. To summarise current data on the vaginal microbiome at Nugent scores 4–6, determine the clinical significance of this intermediate range, and outline possible management algorithms for patients with a borderline microbiological profile. Materials and methods. This review is based on a structured analysis of 78 publications retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (2000–2025), including clinical studies, molecular microbiome analyses, and meta-analyses focused on women with intermediate Nugent scores (4–6). A systematic search strategy with explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria was applied. Included studies: peer-reviewed clinical, molecular, or microbiome analyses with reported Nugent 4–6 data. Excluded: non-peer-reviewed sources, conference abstracts, studies without Nugent stratification. Results. Intermediate scores are linked to reduced Lactobacillus crispatus and L. jensenii, predominance of L. iners, and moderate presence of anaerobes such as Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae. This pattern corresponds to community state type IV (CST- IV), associated with higher risks of BV, recurrent infections, and adverse reproductive outcomes. Symptoms, elevated pH, pregnancy, or immunosuppression justify treatment, while asymptomatic women with normal pH may be observed. Conclusions. These conclusions are based on a synthesis of peer-reviewed scientific literature covering clinical, molecular and microbiome studies published between 2000 and 2025. Data from Gram staining, qPCR, 16S rRNA sequencing, and CST classification support molecular diagnostics and differentiated therapy. Combined regimens using probiotics, antimicrobials, or integrated strategies help stabilise the microbiota and prevent dysbiosis. An intermediate Nugent score should be regarded as a marker of microbial imbalance requiring individualised management and further research toward personalised, biomarker-based care.
References
Moosa Y, Kwon D, de Oliveira T, Wong EB. Determinants of Vaginal Microbiota Composition. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2020 Sep 2;10. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.0046
Bhattacharya A, Das S, Bhattacharjee MJ, Mukherjee AK, Khan MR. Comparative pangenomic analysis of predominant human vaginal lactobacilli strains towards population-specific adaptation: understanding the role in sustaining a balanced and healthy vaginal microenvironment. BMC Genomics. 2023 Sep 22;24(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09665-y
Bhujel R, Mishra SK, Yadav SK, Bista KD, Parajuli K. Comparative study of Amsel’s criteria and Nugent scoring for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in a tertiary care hospital, Nepal. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2021 Aug 17;21(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06562-1
Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1991 Feb;29(2):297–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ jcm.29.2.297-301.1991
Brulin L, Ducrocq S, Even G, Sanchez M, Martel S, Merlin S, et al. Characterization of bovine vaginal microbiota and its relationship with host fertility, health, and production. 2023 Dec 14; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.13.571514
Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SSK., McCulle, SL, Karlebach S, Gorle R, Russell J, & Forney LJ. (2010). Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(supplement_1), 4680–4687. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002611107
Osei Sekyere J, Trama J, Adelson M, Trikannad C, DiBlasi D, Schuster R, et al. Lactobacillus-rich cervicovaginal microbiome associated with lower BV, HPV, and cytology outcomes in women. iScience. 2025 Oct;28(10):113473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.113473
Martín, R., Soberón, N., Vázquez, F., & Suárez, J. E. (2008). La microbiota vaginal: composición, papel protector, patología asociada y perspectivas terapéuticas. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica, 26(3), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1157/13116753
Pryimak OO, Henyk NI. INDICATORS OF PARAMETERS OF CYTOKINE STATUS IN BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS ASSOCIATED WITH FEMALE AGE. Art of Medicine. 2022 Oct 18;99–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.21802/artm.2022.3.23.99
Borrego-Ruiz A, Borrego JJ. (2025) Vaginal dysbiosis: risk boundaries and diagnostic thresholds. Acta Microbiol Hell, 70(1):19–31.
Yeruva T, Rajkumar H, Donugama V. (2017). Vaginal lactobacilli profile in pregnant women with normal & abnormal vaginal flora. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 146(4), 534–540. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_774_16
Skafte-Holm A, Humaidan P, Bernabeu A, Lledo B, Jensen JS, Haahr T. The Association between Vaginal Dysbiosis and Reproductive Outcomes in Sub-Fertile Women Undergoing IVF-Treatment: A Systematic PRISMA Review and Meta-Analysis. Pathogens. 2021 Mar 4;10(3):295. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10030295
McMillan A, Rulisa S, Sumarah M, Macklaim JM, Renaud J, Bisanz JE, et al. A multi-platform metabolomics approach identifies highly specific biomarkers of bacterial diversity in the vagina of pregnant and non-pregnant women. Scientific Reports. 2015 Sep 21;5(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14174
Lu S, Li Z, Chen X, Chen F, Yao H, Sun X, et al. Vaginal microbiota molecular profiling and diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-assisted multiplex PCR testing in women with bacterial vaginosis: a single-center experience. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2024 Apr 5;14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2024.1377225
de Vrese M, Laue C, Papazova E, Petricevic L, Schrezenmeir J. Impact of oral administration of four Lactobacillus strains on Nugent score – systematic review and meta-analysis. Beneficial Microbes. 2019 May 28;10(5):483–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.3920/bm2018.0129
Oliveira LMA, Diniz CG, Fernandes AAS, Souza-Sotte DMK, Freitas MCR, Machado ABF, et al. Assessment of vaginal microbiota in Brazilian women with and without bacterial vaginosis and comparison with Nugent score. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2018 Feb 28;12(02):127–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.3855/jidc.9532
França TGD, Veras FF, Silva NL, Vieira AT. Host immune modulation by vaginal microbiota in intermediate dysbiosis, 2021; mSystems.,6(2):e01148–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.01148-20
Petricevic L, Unger FM, Viernstein H, Kiss H. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of oral lactobacilli to improve the vaginal flora of postmenopausal women. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2008 Nov;141(1):54–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.06.003
Wang X, Jiang Q, Tian X, Chen W, Mai J, Lin G, et al. Metagenomic analysis reveals the novel role of vaginal Lactobacillus iners in Chinese healthy pregnant women. npj Biofilms and Microbiomes. 2025 May 30;11(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41522-025-00731-9
Petrova MI, Reid G, Vaneechoutte M, Lebeer S. Lactobacillus iners : Friend or Foe? Trends in Microbiology. 2017, 25(3), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2016.11.007
Bloom SM, Mafunda NA, Woolston BM, Hayward MR, Frempong JF, Abai AB, et al. Cysteine dependence of Lactobacillus iners is a potential therapeutic target for vaginal microbiota modulation. Nature Microbiology. 2022 Mar 3;7(3):434–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01070-7
Park SH, Lee ES, Park ST, Jeong SY, Yun Y, Kim Y, et al. Efficacy and Safety of MED-01 Probiotics on Vaginal Health: A 12-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Nutrients. 2023 Jan 9;15(2):331. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15020331
Ottinger S, Robertson CM, Branthoover H, Patras KA. The human vaginal microbiota: from clinical medicine to models to mechanisms. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2024 Feb;77:102422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2023.102422
Marschalek J, Farr A, Marschalek ML, Domig KJ, Kneifel W, Singer CF, et al. Influence of Orally Administered Probiotic Lactobacillus Strains on Vaginal Microbiota in Women with Breast Cancer during Chemotherapy: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Double-Blinded Pilot Study. Breast Care. 2017;12(5):335–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000478994
Theiler T, Schoeler S, Möllers M, Schuler F, Olaru ID, Schaumburg F. Bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women: A comparison of the Nugent Score with a multiplex PCR. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 2024 Sep;110(1):116403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116403
Cox C, McKenna JP, Watt AP, Coyle PV. New assay for Gardnerella vaginalis loads correlates with Nugent scores and has potential in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2015 Sep 1;64(9):978–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.000118
Yefet E, Suleiman A, Colodner R, Battino S, Wattad M, Kuzmin O, et al. Efficacy of Oral Probiotic Supplementation in Preventing Vulvovaginal Infections During Pregnancy: A Randomized and Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Nutrients. 2024 Dec 22;16(24):4406. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu16244406
Leitich H, Bodner-Adler B, Brunbauer M, Kaider A, Egarter C, Husslein P. Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for preterm delivery: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2003 Jul;189(1):139–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mob.2003.339
Hillen TIJ, Jefferies WME, Jaquiery A, Morgan C. Bacterial vaginosis and pregnancy outcome: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2002; 57(12):796–802.
Watanabe, N., Watari, T., Akamatsu, K., Miyatsuka, I., & Otsuka, Y. (2025). Performance of deep learning models in predicting the nugent score to diagnose bacterial vaginosis. Microbiology Spectrum, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02344-24
Redelinghuys MJ, Geldenhuys J, Jung H, Kock MM. Bacterial Vaginosis: Current Diagnostic Avenues and Future Opportunities. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2020 Aug 11;10. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00354
Condori-Catachura S, Ahannach S, Ticlla M, Kenfack J, Livo E, Anukam KC, Pinedo-Cancino V, Collado MC, et al. Diversity in women and their vaginal microbiota. Trends in Microbiology. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2024.12.012
Sethi S, Kanaujia R, Yadav R, Sharma N, Dadwal R, Chaudary H, et al. Association of intermediate Nugent Score and bacterial vaginosis with sexually transmitted infections and vulvovaginal candidiasis. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology. 2023 Jul 17;90:296–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/ijdvl_775_2022
Abou Chacra L, Drouet H, Ly C, Bretelle F, Fenollar F. Evaluation of Various Diagnostic Strategies for Bacterial Vaginosis, Including a New Approach Based on MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry. Microorganisms. 2024 Jan 5;12(1):111. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12010111
Mei Z, Li D. The role of probiotics in vaginal health. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2022 Jul 28;12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.963868







