Colorectal cancer and its screening: the level of public awareness according to the survey results
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2077-6594/2025.2/06Keywords:
screening, malignant neoplasms, oncology, colorectal cancer, model, prevention, awareness, public healthAbstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide in both men and women. Early detection of CRC significantly enhances survival rates, yet a considerable proportion of cases are diagnosed at advanced stages. Timely removal of polyps and precancerous lesions during colonoscopy prevents disease progression. Public awareness of CRC and its screening, particularly among general practitioners/family doctors (GPs) and healthcare managers, is crucial to increasing participation in screening and reducing mortality.Purpose. The study aims to assess the level of public awareness regarding CRC and its screening methods among residents aged 45–75 in three regions of Western Ukraine. This research seeks to provide evidence-based insights for developing preventive health education strategies.Materials and methods. A sociological survey was conducted among 1102 participants from Lviv, Volyn, and Rivne regions in2024. The survey employed a structured questionnaire comprising 27 questions, targeting awareness of CRC symptoms, risk factors, and screening methods. The data collection process adhered to ethical standards, ensuring anonymity and voluntariness of participation.The questionnaire included dichotomous, closed, and semi-closed questions. Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel, presenting results as percentages with associated errors. Additionally, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was applied to identify statistically significant relationships. Methods such as systemic analysis, logical generalization, bibliometric review, sociological, analytical, and statistical methods were employed.Results. The survey revealed variable levels of awareness about CRC symptoms among respondents. The most recognized symptom was blood in the stool, identified by 56.53±1.49% of participants, followed by prolonged constipation or diarrhea 42.11%±1.49%, unexplained weight loss 41.92%±1.49%, and abdominal pain or discomfort 40.47%±1.48%. Awareness levels were significantly higher among respondents with higher education 66.23%±2.72% compared to those with incomplete secondary education 39.58%±4.99%. Gender differences were also noted, with women demonstrating greater awareness of symptoms such as blood in the stool (61.85%±1.92% vs. 49.25%±2.32%; p≤0.001).Regarding CRC screening, 54.54%±1.50% of respondents were aware of its availability, while 59.98%±1.48% were unaware of the recommended age to commence screening. Nearly half (49.91%±1.51%) recognized a family history of CRC as a risk factor, yet 23.59%±1.28% could not identify any risk factors. Family doctors were the preferred source of information for 71.14%±1.36% of participants, highlighting their crucial role in public health education. Internet and mass media were secondary but notable sources, particularly among respondents with higher education. However, 8.98%±0.86% of participants expressed a lack of interest in CRC topics, correlating with lower education levels and reduced awareness of screening guidelines.Key barriers to CRC screening included fear of the procedure (69.96%±1.38%) and insufficient information (44.10%±1.50%). These findings underscore the necessity of educational campaigns emphasizing the safety and importance of screening. Women and individuals with higher education exhibited greater apprehension toward the procedure, indicating the need for tailored reassurance strategies.Conclusions. The study highlights a substantial gap in CRC awareness and screening practices among the target population.Results suggest that educational interventions should prioritize family doctors as information conduits while leveraging digital and mass media to enhance outreach. Addressing misconceptions and procedural fears through focused campaigns could significantly increase participation in CRC screening programs. By fostering public awareness, particularly among less informed and male subpopulations, the study aims to contribute to reducing CRC-related morbidity and mortality rates in Ukraine.
References
Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Laversanne M, Colombet M, Mery L, et al. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2024. [Інтернет]. Доступно на: https://gco.iarc.who.int/today.
Ferlizza E, Solmi R, Sgarzi M, Ricciardiello L, Lauriola M. The Roadmap of Colorectal Cancer Screening. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(5):1101. Published 2021 Mar 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13051101.
Федоренко ЗП, Гулак ЛО, Михайлович ЮЙ та ін. Рак в Україні, 2021–2022. Захворюваність, смертність, показ- ники діяльності онкологічної служби. Бюлетень Національного канцер-реєстру України. № 24. [Інтернет]. Доступно на: http://www.ncru.inf.ua/publications/BULL_24/index.htm (дата звернення: 16.09.2023).
Park IJ. Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer. Ewha Med J. 2023;46(s1):e28. https://doi.org/10.12771/emj.2023.e28.
Yoo BS, Patel A, Houston KV, Vargas A, Vilela Sangay AR, D’Souza SM, et al. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal cancers. Explor Med. 2023;4:356–62. https://doi.org/10.37349/emed.2023.00147.
Worthington J, Sun Z, Fu R, Lew JB, Chan KKW, et al. COVID-related disruptions to colorectal cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment could increase cancer Burden in Australia and Canada: A modelling study. PLOS ONE. 2024. 19(4): e0296945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296945.
Concepcion J, Yeager M, Alfaro S, et al. Trends of Cancer Screenings, Diagnoses, and Mortalities During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications and Future Recommendations. The American Surgeon. 2022;89(6):2276‒2283. DOI: 10.1177/00031348221091948.
Park H, Seo SH, Park JH, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on screening for colorectal, gastric, breast, and cervical cancer in Korea. Epidemiol Health. 2022;44.e2022053. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2022053.
Коваль АА, Гржибовський ЯЛ. «Карта оцінки обізнаності населення щодо злоякісних захворювань органів травного тракту». Державна організація «Український національний офіс інтелектуальної власності та інновацій». Cвідоцтво про реє- страцію авторського права на твір від 18.11.2024 р. № 131444.
Triantafillidis JK, Vagianos C, Gikas A, Korontzi M, Papalois A. Screening for colorectal cancer: the role of the primary care physician. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;29(1):e1‒e7. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000000759.
Selby K, Bartlett-Esquilant G & Cornuz J. Personalized cancer screening: helping primary care rise to the challenge. Public Health Rev 39, 4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-018-0083-x.
Partyka O, Pajewska M, Czerw A, et al. Current Progress in Clinical Research in Secondary Prevention and Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2025;17(3):367. Published 2025 Jan 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17030367.
Guiriguet-Capdevila C, Muñoz-Ortiz L, Rivero-Franco I et al. Can an alert in primary care electronic medical records increase participation in a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer? COLO-ALERT, a randomised clinical trial. BMC Cancer 14, 232. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-232.
Gac A, Kędzior KJ, Pogorzelczyk K, Wojtecka A, Wojnarowska M, Robakowska M, Kalinowska-Beszczyńska O, Libura M, Kolasa K, Włodarczyk WC, et al. Patients’ Expectations and Preferences for the Organizational Conditions of the Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme in Poland: A Qualitative Analysis. Healthcare. 2023; 11(3):371. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11030371.
Goodwin BC, Ireland MJ, March S et al. Strategies for increasing participation in mail-out colorectal cancer screening programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 8, 257. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1170-x.
Myers L, Goodwin B, March S, Dunn J. Ways to use interventions to increase participation in mail-out bowel cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Behav Med. 2020;10(2):384–393. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz081.
Knudsen AB, Rutter CM, Peterse EFP, et al. Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Updated Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2021;325(19):1998–2011. https://doi.org/doi:10.1001/jama.2021.5746.
Nesiama E, Prakash S, Mansi T, Merza N, Trammell D, Balducci M, et al. Elucidating the Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Rural Population. West Texas Journal of Medicine, 1(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.59311/wtjm.v1i1.1.
Paskett E, Bernardo B, Young G, Katz M, Reiter P, Tatum C et al. Comparative effectiveness of two interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening for those at increased risk based on family history: results of a randomized trial. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers &Amp; Prevention 2020;29(1):3‒9. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-0797.
Alghamdi AA, Almutairi AH, Aldosari FS, et al. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Primary Healthcare Physicians in Riyadh Second Health Cluster. Cureus. 2022. 14(11): e32069. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32069.
Slyne TC, Gautam R, King V. Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Educational Intervention for Nurse Practitioners to Increase Screening Awareness and Participation. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2017;21(5):543‒546. https://doi.org/10.1188/17.CJON.543-546.
Subramanian S, Tangka F, DeGroff A, & Richardson L. Integrated approaches to delivering cancer screenings to address disparities: lessons learned from the evaluation of cdc’s colorectal cancer control program. Implementation Science Communications 2022;3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00346-7.