APPLICATION OF BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS METHODS TO HELP FIGHT COVID-19

Authors

  • V.A. Smiianov
  • V.O. Kurhanska

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24144/2077-6594.3.2020.208617

Keywords:

behavioral economics, prevention coronavirus, COVID-19

Abstract

The aim is to study a set of applied scientific knowledge and evidence that influences people’s decisions and behavior and can be used in the fight against COVID-19.
Materials and methods. The study included coverage of the main issues of preventive control of the coronavirus, using the knowledge and methods of behavioral economics, which were developed on the basis of own research (social experiment method, questionnaire) with subsequent statistical processing of data and on the most current data in the world literature.
Results. Experimental studies and social surveys have shown that the using of behavioral methods in combination with preventive measures significantly affects the behavior of people, reducing the possibility of transmission of the virus.
Conclusions. Behavioral economics-based interventions allow for certain behavioral changes that can turn new habits into longer-term health benefits and reducing the risk of overburdening the health care system, which is one of the major concerns of the COVID-19 pandemic.

References

Akl E. A., Oxman A. D., Herrin J., Vist G. E., Terrenato I., Sperati F., Schünemann H. Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3. – 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/ 14651858.CD006776.pub2.

Anderson R. M., Heesterbeek H., Klinkenberg D., Hollingsworth T. D. How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? // Lancet. – 2020. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5.

Cacioppo J. T., Hughes M. E., Waite L. J., Hawkley L. C., Thisted R. A.. Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psychology and Aging. – 2006. – Vol. 21(1) P. 140. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.140.

Fehr E., Gachter S. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments // American Economic Review. – 2000. – Vol. 90. – P. 980-994. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.4.980.

Hanefeld J., Mayhew S., Balabanova D. Towards an understanding of resilience: Responding to health systems shocks // Health Policy and Planning. – 2018. – Vol. 33. – P. 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx183.

Hellewell J., Abbott S., Zandvoort K. (2020). Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts // The Lancet Global Health. – 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214- 109X(20)30074-7.

Kwok Y. L. A., Gralton J., McLaws M. L. Face touching: A frequent habit that has implications for hand hygiene // American Journal of Infection Control. – 2015. – Vol. 43. – P. 112–114.

Liu X., Kakade M., Fuller C. J., Wu, P. Depression after exposure to stressful events: lessons learned from the severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic. // Comprehensive psychiatry. – 2012. – Vol. 53(1). – P. 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.comppsych.2011.02.003.

Masclet D., Noussair C., Tucker S., Villeval M. C. Monetary and nonmonetary punishment in the voluntary contributions mechanism // American Economic Review. – 2003. – Vol. 93. – P. 366-380.

Mawson A. R. Understanding mass panic and other collective responses to threat and disaster // Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes. – 2005. – Vol. 68. – P. 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2005.68.2.95.

Moussaïd M., Trauernicht M. Patterns of cooperation during collective emergencies in the helpor-escape social dilemma. Scientific Reports, 6, 33417. – 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33417.

OECD. Behavioural insights and public policy: lessons from around the world. – 2017. Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264270480-en.

Pavitt C. The Path to Cooperative Action during Group Social Dilemmas: A Literature Review, Set of Propositions, and Model Describing How the Opportunity to Communicate Encourages Cooperation. Review of Communication Research. – 2018. – Vol. 6. – P. 54-83. https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2018.06.01.016.

Rabie T., Curtis V. Handwashing and risk of respiratory infections: A quantitative systematic review // Tropical Medicine & International Health. – 2006. Vol. 11(3). P. 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 3156.2006.01568.x.

Savage D. A., Torgler B. Stocking up to prepare for a crisis isn’t «panic buying». It’s actually a pretty rational choice. Available at: https://theconversation.com/stocking-up-to-prepare-for-a-crisis-isnt-panicbuying-its-actually-a-pretty-rational-choice-132437 [Accessed 09/03/2020].

Smith R. D. Responding to global infectious disease outbreaks: Lessons from SARS on the role of risk perception, communication and management. // Social Science & Medicine. – 2006. – Vol. 63. – P. 3113–3123. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.socscimed.2006.08.004.

Sohrabi C., Alsafi Z., Agha R. World Health Organization declares Global Emergency: A review of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) // International Journal of Surgery. – 2020. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijsu.2020.02.034.

Wu P., Liu X., Fang Y., Litvak I. J. Alcohol abuse/dependence symptoms among hospital employees exposed to a SARS outbreak // Alcohol & Alcoholism. – 2018. – Vol. 43(6). – P. 706-712. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agn073.

Published

2023-04-27