Compensation of pathological tooth mobility impact on the static occlusal maxillo-mandibular relationship registration with the use of intraoral scanner
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-7684/2024-2-4Keywords:
prosthetic treatment, tooth mobility, occlusion, occlusal relationship, intraoral scannerAbstract
Introduction. Ones of the factors that affect the accuracy of maxillo-mandibular static occlusion relationship registration using intraoral scanning technology are fremitus and pathological mobility of teeth, since such can provoke the dislocation of the teeth as graphical objects within the structure of the received scan under the influence of contact with teeth-antagonists in comparison with the position of the same teeth, which was registered when the jaws were non-occluded. Objective of the research. To evaluate the possibility of compensating the impact of pathological mobility, as well as the phenomenon of fremitus on spatial deviations of teeth during the registration of static interocclusal maxillo-mandibular relationship with the use of intraoral scanner. Materials and methods. Approbation of approaches used to compensate the influence of pathological mobility and fremitus on the accuracy of intraoral bite scanning was carried out only among patients who were clinically diagnosed with 1st degree of pathological tooth mobility (up to 1 mm in the buccal-lingual direction), or with the clinical phenomenon of fremitus. A total of 34 sets of intraoral scans (upper jaw, lower jaw, and a scan-record of the static occlusal maxillo-mandibular relationship) were obtained from 34 patients with signs of pathological mobility or fremitus of individual teeth, while for each patient 3 different bite-scans were obtained (without implementation of any approaches to compensate the influence of pathological mobility or fremitus of the teeth; with segmentation of areas characterized with pathological mobility or fremitus during the registration of the static occlusal maxillo-mandibular relationship; bite scanning while using the teeth without any signs of pathological mobility as stable references). Evaluation of the effectiveness of above-mentioned practical approaches aimed at compensating the influence of pathological mobility and fremitus of teeth on the accuracy of intraoral scanning during the registration of static occlusal maxillo-mandibular relationship was carried out by processing the received intraoral scans in the Medit Link software (Medit Corp., Seoul, South Korea) with further determination of teeth spatial deviations within the registered scans in the Medit Design application. Results and discussions. The range of deviations obtained for spatial position of teeth, which were characterized by the presence of pathological mobility and/or fremitus signs, and which were included within the digital occlusal scan, was 189-456 μm compared to position of the same teeth within the structure of the non-occluded mandibular or maxillary scans, without implementation of any additional measures aimed at compensating the impact of existing pathological mobility. Segmentation (trimming) of teeth with signs of pathological mobility or those with signs of fremitus from scans of upper and lower jaws, made it possible to reach the range of spatial deviations of teeth that were included within the digital occlusal scan up to 116-216 μm compared to the position of such teeth within the structure of the nonoccluded mandibular or maxillary scans. Statistically significant differences were confirmed only for the maximum values of spatial deviations when comparing approaches with segmentation (trimming) of teeth with signs of pathological mobility or fremitus, and such without the implementation of any additional measures aimed at compensating the influence of pathological mobility/fremitus (p < 0,05). Conclusions. Segmentation (trimming) of teeth with signs of 1st degree pathological mobility and/or signs of fremitus helped to reduce the range of the spatial deviations for teeth included within the structure of bite scans in comparison with position of such teeth, which was registered on non-occluded lower or upper jaws’ scans. However, proposed approach characterized by only limited effectiveness and partially compensated the negative impact of pathological mobility and fremitus phenomena on the accuracy of registering static interocclusal maxillomandibular relationship with the use of intraoral scanner in conditions where the range of tooth mobility does not exceed 1 mm, because no statistically significant difference was noted regarding minimum and maximum values of spatial deviations when comparing the approach with segmentation (trimming) of teeth with signs of pathological mobility or fremitus, and one that included the registration of static occlusal relationship only within the boundaries of teeth without any signs of pathological mobility (p > 0,05).
References
Sanda M, Miyoshi K, Baba K. Trueness and precision of digital implant impressions by intraoral scanners: a literature review. International Journal of Implant Dentistry. 2021 Dec;7:1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00352-9
Amornvit P, Rokaya D, Sanohkan S. Comparison of accuracy of current ten intraoral scanners. BioMed research international. 2021;2021(1):2673040. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2673040
Vitai V, Németh A, Sólyom E, Czumbel LM, Szabó B, Fazekas R, Gerber G, Hegyi P, Hermann P, Borbély J. Evaluation of the accuracy of intraoral scanners for complete-arch scanning: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Journal of Dentistry. 2023 Jul 27:104636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104636
Morsy N, El Kateb M. Accuracy of intraoral scanners for static virtual articulation: A systematic review and metaanalysis of multiple outcomes. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022 Nov 1:S0022-3913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.005
Sindhu S, Maiti S, Nallaswamy D. Factors affecting the accuracy of intraoral scanners-a systematic review. Annals of Dental Specialty. 2023;11(1-2023):40-52. https://doi.org/10.51847/izu17ACVUd
Ma J, Zhang B, Song H, Wu D, Song T. Accuracy of digital implant impressions obtained using intraoral scanners: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo studies. International Journal of Implant Dentistry. 2023 Dec 6;9(1):48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00517-8
Revilla‐León M, Kois DE, Kois JC. A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans: Part 2–Patient factors. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2023 Jan;35(1):241-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12993
Revilla-León M, Jiang P, Sadeghpour M, Piedra-Cascón W, Zandinejad A, Özcan M, Krishnamurthy VR. Intraoral digital scans: Part 2–influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the mesh quality of different intraoral scanners. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2020 Nov 1;124(5):575-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.004
Revilla-León M, Jiang P, Sadeghpour M, Piedra-Cascón W, Zandinejad A, Özcan M, Krishnamurthy VR. Intraoral digital scans–Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2020 Sep 1;124(3):372-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.003
Revilla-León M, Barmak AB, Tohme H, Yilmaz B, Kois JC, Gómez-Polo M. Factors that influence the accuracy of maxillomandibular relationship at maximum intercuspation acquired by using intraoral scanners: A systematic review. Journal of dentistry. 2023 Sep 27:104718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104718
Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Yilmaz B, Pérez-Barquero JA. Influence of occlusal collision corrections completed by two intraoral scanners or a dental design program on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2024 Jul 1;132(1):191-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.05.015
Revilla‐León M, Kois DE, Zeitler JM, Att W, Kois JC. An overview of the digital occlusion technologies: Intraoral scanners, jaw tracking systems, and computerized occlusal analysis devices. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2023 Jul;35(5):735-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13044
Revilla-León M, Agustín-Panadero R, Zeitler JM, Barmak AB, Yilmaz B, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA. Differences in maxillomandibular relationship recorded at centric relation when using a conventional method, four intraoral scanners, and a jaw tracking system: A clinical study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2023 Jan 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.12.007
Revilla-León M, Fernández-Estevan L, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA. Accuracy of maximum intercuspal position located by using four intraoral scanners and an artificial intelligence-based program. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2024 Apr 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.03.007
Chinam N, Bekkali M, Kallas M, Li J. Virtual occlusal records acquired by using intraoral scanners: A review of factors that influence maxillo‐mandibular relationship accuracy. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2023 Dec;32(S2):192-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13787
Lu B, Zhu J, Shao L, Yu Q. Effect of Tooth Mobility on the Accuracy of Conventional Impressions: A Pilot Study. The International journal of prosthodontics. 2024 Apr 22;37(2):232. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7774
Fan J, Caton JG. Occlusal trauma and excessive occlusal forces: Narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. Journal of periodontology. 2018 Jun;89:S214-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.16-0581
DeLong R, Ko CC, Anderson GC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2002 Dec 1;88(6):622-30. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.129379
Li L, Chen H, Wang Y, Sun Y. Construction of virtual intercuspal occlusion: Considering tooth displacement. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2021 Jun;48(6):701-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13153
Meirelles L, Siqueira R, Garaicoa‐Pazmino C, Yu SH, Chan HL, Wang HL. Quantitative tooth mobility evaluation based on intraoral scanner measurements. Journal of periodontology. 2020 Feb;91(2):202-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.19-0282
Li L, Chen H, Li W, Wang Y, Sun Y. Design of wear facets of mandibular first molar crowns by using patient-specific motion with an intraoral scanner: A clinical study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2023 May 1;129(5):710-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.048
Ding Q, Pu T, Tu Y, He M, Wang S, Zhang L, Liu J, Zhou Y. Effect of a novel interocclusal recording method on occlusal accuracy of implant‐supported fixed prostheses: A randomized clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2023 Mar;34(3):275-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14040
Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, Van Der Meer WJ, Wismeijer DW. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2014 Mar 1;111(3):186-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.010
Jeong Y, Shim JS, Kim JH, Kim JE, Lee H. Accuracy of bite registration using intraoral scanner based on data trimming strategy for fremitus teeth. Journal of Korean Dental Science. 2022 Jun 30;15(1):61-7. http://doi.org/10.5856/JKDS.2022.15.1.61
Zimmermann M, Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. Accuracy of buccal scan procedures for the registration of habitual intercuspation. Operative Dentistry. 2018 Nov 1;43(6):573-80. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-272-C
Wong KY, Esguerra RJ, Chia VA, Tan YH, Tan KB. Three‐dimensional accuracy of digital static interocclusal registration by three intraoral scanner systems. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2018 Feb;27(2):120-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12714
Jin G, Kim JE, Nam NE, Shin SH, Shim JS. Accuracy improvement of intraoral scanning and buccal bite registration using healing abutment as landmarks: an in vitro study. Applied Sciences. 2020 Dec 30;11(1):318. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010318
Wu Z, Tu Y, Wang S, Ding Q, Zhang L. Digitally designed occlusion of an implant-supported crown considering physiological tooth displacement under occlusal loading. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2023 Oct 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.09.021