SANITARY AND HYGIENIC STATE OF SOIL BY MICROBIOLOGICAL INDICATORS: DATA FROM METAGENOMIC AND CULTURAL ANALYSES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-7684/2026-1-9Keywords:
soil, sanitary and hygienic state, technogenic load, coliforms, metagenomic analysis, 16S rRNA, cultural analysis, FAPROTAXAbstract
Introduction. Under conditions of increased technogenic load and enterprise relocation, monitoring the sanitary and hygienic state of soils is critical for the region’s environmental safety. Current regulatory gaps and the limitations of classical analytical methods necessitate the implementation of modern molecular genetic approaches for an objective assessment of territories. Objective. The work aims to evaluate the sanitary and hygienic state of technogenically modified soils in Transcarpathia using traditional cultural and modern metagenomic methods. Materials and Methods. The study focused on soil samples from the zones influenced by a timber chemical plant and railway transport, collected in June 2025. The methodology included classical plating on selective media and metagenomic sequencing of 16S rRNA gene regions, followed by functional prediction using the FAPROTAX database. Results. It was established that the total microbial count in technogenic zones significantly exceeds the control, although no direct signs of recent fecal contamination were found (coli-index <1000 CFU/kg). Metagenomic analysis recorded a twofold higher content of nitrifiers in technogenic soils, indicating intensive self-purification processes, and identified functional groups of potential pathogens (Burkholderiales, Aquabacterium, C. perfringens) that indicate potential epidemic hazards and long-term contamination. Conclusions. The combination of classical and metagenomic methods ensures high accuracy in hygienic assessment, revealing hidden changes in the microbial community structure of technogenic areas. The findings emphasize the need to modernize the monitoring system and include genetic indicators in the protocols for sanitary-epidemiological soil control.
References
FAO and UNEP. Global Assessment of Soil Pollution: Report. Rome: FAO; 2021. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4894en
Zakon Ukrainy Pro okhoronu zemel. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR). 2003;39. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/962-15/ed20100731/comp20220507
DSP 173 Pro zatverdzhennia Derzhavnykh sanitarnykh pravyl planuvannia ta zabudovy naselenykh punktiv [State Sanitary Rules for Planning and Development of Settlements]. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0379-96#Text
DSTU 4288:2004 Yakist gruntu. Pasport gruntiv [Soil quality. Soil passport]. Kyiv: Derzhspozhyvstandart Ukrainy; 2005. Available from: https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page?id_doc=58883
Orgiazzi A, Bardgett RD, Barrios E, Behan-Pelletier V, Briones MJI, Chotte JL, et al., editors. Global Soil Biodiversity Atlas. Luxembourg: European Commission, Publications Office of the European Union; 2016.176 p. DOI: 10.2788/799182
Guidelines on sanitation and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241514705
DSTU HOST 17.4.4.02:2019 Okhorona dovkillia. Yakist gruntu. Metody vidbyrannia ta pidhotuvannia prob dlia khimichnoho, bakteriolohichnoho, helmintolohichnoho analizu [Environmental protection. Soil quality. Methods for samplingand preparation of samples for chemical, bacteriological, helminthological analysis]. Kyiv: SE «UkrNDNC»; 2019. Available from: https://dbn.co.ua/load/normativy/dstu/gost_17_4_3_01_2019/5-1-0-1845
DSTU ISO 10381-2:2004 Vidbyrannia prob. Chastyna 2. Nastanovy z metodiv vidbyrannia prob (ISO 10381-2:2002, IDT). Kyiv: Derzhspozhyvstandart Ukrainy; 2006. Available from: https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page?id_doc=58855
Kovalenko NI, Amazii TM, compilers. Sanitarna mikrobiolohiia. Kharkiv: KhNMU; 2021. 48 p. Available from: https://repo.knmu.edu.ua/bitstreams/0fdad0d7-3150-4e98-86af-fe4ea42e7ee2/download
Sansupa C, Wahdan SFM, Hossen S, Disayathanoowat T, Wubet T, Purahong W. Can we use functional annotation of prokaryotic taxa (FAPROTAX) to assign the ecological functions of soil bacteria? Appl Sci. 2021;11(2):688. 10.3390/app11020688
Xie N, Zhong L, Ouyang L, Xu W, Zeng Q, Wang K, et al. Community Composition and Function of Bacteria in Activated Sludge of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants. Water. 2021;13(6):852. doi: 10.3390/w13060852
Cloutier DD, Alm EW, McLellan SL. The influence of land-use, nutrients, and geography on microbial communities and fecal indicator abundance at Lake Michigan beaches. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(15):4904–13. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00233-15
Pyz-Łukasik R, Paszkiewicz W, Tatara MR, Brodzki P, Bełkot Z. Microbiological quality of milk sold directly from producers to consumers. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98(7):4294–301. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-9187
Chmiel MJ, Frączek K. Mikroorganizmy wskaźnikowe w ocenie stanu sanitarnego gleby. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych. 2016;587:51–62. Available from: http://agro.icm.edu.pl/agro/element/bwmeta1.element.agro-6be76b54-8e81-4da9-9684-df8ed2a796a9/c/51-62.pdf
Zatoń-Sieczka K, Błaszak M. The microbiological and sanitary state of sand in the municipal bathing beach in Szczecin. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 2015;16(4):40–5. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/60452
Mykyta KhI, Rohach IM, Koval HM. Analiz stanu zabrudnennia gruntu v Zakarpatskii oblasti v dynamitsi vprodovzh 2013–2017 rokiv. Sci Bull Uzhhorod Univ, Ser Med. 2018;2(58):119–24. DOI: 10.24144/2415-8127.2018.58.119-124






