ORAL MICROBIAL DYSBIOSIS INDEX: FROM MICROBIOLOGICAL REPORT TO A SINGLE NUMBER IN PRE-IMPLANT SCREENING

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-7684/2026-2-2

Keywords:

microbial dysbiosis, pre-implant screening, non-commensal microbiota, antibiotic resistance, periodontitis, dental implantation

Abstract

Introduction. Microbiological monitoring at the pre-implant stage is gaining increasing clinical importance due to the rising prevalence of antibiotic-resistant strains within the oral microbiota and the established association between the microbiological profile of periodontal pockets and the risk of peri-implant complications. Despite the evident relevance of microbiological screening, routine laboratory reports typically provide only qualitative characterization of the microbiota, lacking a quantitative measure of dysbiotic changes suitable for individual risk stratification and evidence-based clinical decision-making. Aim – to develop and perform a preliminary validation of the Oral Microbial Dysbiosis Index (MDI) – a quantitative parameter for preimplant screening of periodontal pocket microbiota, calculated based on routine bacteriological examination results. Materials and Methods. The study included 59 patients with Stage II-III periodontitis (EFP/AAP, 2017) undergoing pre-implant preparation. Microbiological analysis of periodontal pockets was performed with determination of the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profile (21 antibiotics). The MDI was calculated as the ratio of non-commensal microorganisms to the total number of identified taxa. The association between MDI and antibiotic resistance levels was assessed using Spearman’s correlation, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and ROC analysis. Results. The mean MDI value was 21,0±19.9% (median 25,0%). Non-commensal microbiota were detected in 55,9% of patients. According to MDI levels, patients were stratified into: low risk (MDI=0%) – 26 (44,1%), moderate risk (MDI>0-33,3%) – 22 (37,3%), and high risk (MDI>33,3%) – 11 (18,6%). A statistically significant correlation was found between MDI and antibiotic resistance level (r = 0,363; p = 0,005). The AMR level in the high-risk group was twice that of the low-risk group (median 2,5 vs 1,0; H = 8,146; p = 0,017). The AUC of MDI for predicting MDR risk was 0,611 (95% CI: 0,463-0,759; threshold 33,3%). Multidrug resistance (MDR) was identified in 23 patients (39,0%); its prevalence increased with rising MDI levels: 30,8% in the low-risk group, 40,9% in the moderate-risk group, and 54,5% in the high-risk group. Conclusions. The MDI is a clinically accessible quantitative parameter that transforms routine microbiological reports into a numerical measure of dysbiotic risk, enabling patient risk stratification at the pre-implant stage. The index demonstrates a statistically significant association with AMR levels (r = 0.363; p = 0.005) and a limited but above-chance discriminatory capacity for MDR (AUC = 0.611; 95% CI: 0,463–0,759). The empirically defined threshold of 33,3% requires confirmation in independent studies.

References

Schwarz F, Derks J, Monje A, Wang HL. Peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(Suppl 20):S246–S266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12954.

Humeniuk VO. Results of the Assessment of the Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of Pathogenic Oral Microorganisms in Patients with Chronic Generalized Periodontitis at the Pre-Implantation Stage. Actual Dentistry. 2026;(6):62–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2025-6-62.

Hajishengallis G, Darveau RP, Curtis MA. The keystone-pathogen hypothesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10(10):717–725. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2873.

Chen T, Marsh PD, Al-Hebshi NN. SMDI: An Index for Measuring Subgingival Microbial Dysbiosis. J Dent Res. 2022;101(3):331–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345211035775.

Caton JG, Armitage G, Berglundh T, et al. A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(Suppl 20):S1–S8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12935.

Renvert S, Persson GR, Pirih FQ, Camargo PM. Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis: Case definitions and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S304–S312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.17-0588.

Tonetti MS, Greenwell H, Kornman KS. Staging and grading of periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45 (Suppl 20):S149–S161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12945.

EUCAST. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 14.0. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; 2024. Available from: https://www.eucast.org

Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(3):268–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x.

Mombelli A, Decaillet F. The characteristics of biofilms in peri-implant disease. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(Suppl 11):203–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01666.x.

Steyerberg EW. Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating. 2nd ed. Springer; 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16399-0.

Stojanov S, Berlec A, Štrukelj B. The influence of probiotics on the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in the treatment of obesity and inflammatory bowel disease. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(11): 1715. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111715.

Blount K, Jones C, Walsh D, Gonzalez C, Shannon WD. Development and Validation of a Novel Microbiome-Based Biomarker of Post-antibiotic Dysbiosis and Subsequent Restoration. Front Microbiol. 2022;12:781275. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.781275.

Wei S, Bahl MI, Baunwall SMD, Hvas CL, Licht TR. Determining Gut Microbial Dysbiosis: a Review of Applied Indexes for Assessment of Intestinal Microbiota Imbalances. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021;87(11):e00395-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00395-21.

Krivtsova MV., Kostenko YeYa. Dominuiuchi mikrobni asotsiatsii porozhnyny rota v umovakh heneralizovanoho parodontytu ta osoblyvosti yikh chutlyvosti do antybakterialnykh preparativ [Dominant microbial associations of the oral cavity in generalized periodontitis and their sensitivity to antibacterial agents]. Studia Biologica. 2020;14(1):51–62. https://doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1401.613 [in Ukrainian].

Tsai YC, Tai WC, Liang CM, Wu CK, Tsai MC, Hu WH, Huang PY, Chen CH, Kuo YH, Yao CC, Chuah SK. Alterations of the gut microbiota and the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio after biologic treatment in inflammatory bowel disease. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2025; 58(1): 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2024.09.006.

Di Spirito F, Giordano F, Di Palo MP, D’Ambrosio F, Scognamiglio B, Sangiovanni G, Caggiano M, Gasparro R. Microbiota of Peri-Implant Healthy Tissues, Peri-Implant Mucositis, and Peri-Implantitis: A Comprehensive Review. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(6): 1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12061137.

de Campos Kajimoto NC, de Paiva Buischi Y, Mohamadzadeh M, Loomer P. The oral microbiome of peri-implant health and disease: a narrative review. Dent J (Basel). 2024;12(10):299. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12100299.

Chun GK, Menon RK. The microbiome of peri-implantitis: a systematic review of next-generation sequencing studies. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023;12(11):1610. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12111610.

Mehrnia N, Van Dyke TE. Microbial dysbiosis and immune dysregulation in periodontitis and peri-implantitis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2026;15:1678163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1678163.

Published

2026-05-30

Issue

Section

DENTISTRY