DETERMINATION OF THE RETENTION STRENGTH OF A REMOVABLE DENTAL PROSTHESIS SUPPORTED BY A VARIOUS NUMBER OF MINI-IMPLANTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-7684/2026-1-8

Keywords:

dentistry, dental prosthetics, removable structures, implants, denture retention

Abstract

Introduction. Retention is one of the most important factors in the successful use of removable dentures supported on dental implants, as well as conditionally removable dentures. In the context of using mini-implants as supporting elements, the number of implants has been proposed as the primary variable affecting denture retention, mechanical stability, durability of use, and patient satisfaction. Methodology and methods of the study. The study aimed to investigate the retention force of retainers for complete removable dentures with fixation on dental mini-implants in different design variants in laboratory conditions. Jaw models with four parallel installed miniimplants were used. O-ring matrix sleeves were fixed to the acrylic plate of the prosthesis. The retention force was determined using a strain gauge, with the maximum load upon detachment recorded in Newtons. For each configuration (1, 2 side by side, 2 opposite, 3 and 4 supports) 10 measurements were performed. Summary of the primary study material. A gradual increase in retention force with increasing number of mini-implants was established: 5.31±1.15 N (1 support), 9.72±1.81 N (2 side by side), 11.90±3.17 N (2 opposite), 18.45±3.31 N (3 supports) and 21.73±2.95 N (4 supports). The ANOVA test revealed statistically significant differences between groups (p<0.001). Paired comparisons showed significant differences between all groups, except for two configurations with 2 implants (p=0.14). The effect size was large (η² = 0.846), indicating a strong association between the number of implants and retention. The obtained data confirm a linear relationship between the number of supports and the prosthesis's fixation force and are consistent with the current literature. An increase in the number of mini-implants significantly increases retention, although the increase between three and four supports is less pronounced. The limitations of the study include the model's laboratory nature and the absence of clinical factors, so the results require further clinical verification. Conclusions. The use of two, three, and four supports progressively increases the retention force of a removable denture supported by dental implants. The location of implants in non-adjacent segments of the dentition in a two-support design also increases retention force compared to when the supports are adjacent.

References

Daou EE. Stud attachments for the mandibular implant-retained overdentures: Prosthetic complications. A literature review. Saudi Dent J. 2013 ;25(2):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2012.12.003.

Patil PG, Seow LL, Uddanwadikar R, Ukey PD. Biomechanical behavior of mandibular overdenture retained by two standard implants or 2 mini-implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(1): 138.e1-138.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.015.

Mykhajlychenko BG, Humeniuk VO, Mochalov IO, Tukalo IV, Vakhrusheva TM, Bilichenko IO, Mochalov OO. The influence of implant channel preparation technique on the mechanical and radiological properties of bone during the dental miniimplants placement (ex-vivo experimental study). Wiad Lek. 2025; 78(9):1771-1776. doi: 10.36740/WLek/212511.

Celebic A, Kovacic I, Petricevic N, Alhajj MN, Topic J, Junakovic L, Persic-Kirsic S. Clinical Outcomes of Three versus Four Mini-Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture: A 5-Year Randomized Clinical Trial. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;60(1):17. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010017.

Aljudaibi SM, Alqhtani MAZ, Almeslet AS, Aldowah O, Alhendi KDS. Retention of Mandibular Complete Overdentures using Mini Dental Implants (Ø < 3 mm) and Standard Diameter Implants (Ø > 3mm): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2024; 22: 181-188. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b5282167.

Aung ZHP, Win PP, Sastraruji T, Khongkhunthian P. Ball versus other attachments in mini-implant retained overdenture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):560. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05961-z.

Alshenaiber R, Barclay C, Silikas N. The Effect of Mini Dental Implant Number on Mandibular Overdenture Retention and Attachment Wear. Biomed Res Int. 2023; 2023: 7099761. doi: 10.1155/2023/7099761.

Canizales AM. Evaluation of retention using different numbers and position of attachments with mini dental implant overdentures [thesis]. Morgantown (WV): West Virginia University; 2011. Available from: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/3270

Mirchandani B, Zhou T, Heboyan A, Yodmongkol S, Buranawat B. Biomechanical Aspects of Various Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Review. Polymers (Basel). 2021; 13(19): 3248. doi: 10.3390/polym13193248.

Bukvic H, Schenk N, Hinz S, Schimmel M, Enkling N, Abou-Ayash S. Retention forces in mini-dental-implant retained mandibular overdentures: 10-year outcomes of a non-comparative longitudinal observational study. Int J Implant Dent. 2025;11(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40729-025-00620-y.

Flanagan D. Frailty and mini dental implants. Clin Case Rep. 2023; 11(12): e7982. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.7982.

Valente MLC, Shimano MVW, Agnelli JAM, Dos Reis AC. Retention force and deformation of an innovative attachment model for mini-implant-retained overdentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121(1): 129-134. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.010.

Abou-Ayash S, Enkling N, Srinivasan M, Haueter M, Worni A, Schimmel M. Evolution of in vivo assessed retention forces in one-piece mini dental implant-retained mandibular overdentures: 5-Year follow-up of a prospective clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019; 21(5): 968-976. doi: 10.1111/cid.12816.

Türk PE, Geckili O, Türk Y, Günay V, Bilgin T. In vitro comparison of the retentive properties of ball and locator attachments for implant overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29(5): 1106-1113. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3621.

Scherer MD, McGlumphy EA, Seghi RR, Campagni WV. Comparison of retention and stability of implant-retained overdentures based upon implant number and distribution. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28(6): 1619-1628. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3067.

Published

2026-04-03

Issue

Section

DENTISTRY