BLASTOCYST MORPHOLOGY AS A PREDICTOR OF EUPLOIDY: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF PGT-A CYCLES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/1998-6475.2025.59.24

Keywords:

blastocyst, embryo morphology, euploidy, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), assisted reproductive technologies (ART), embryonic anatomy, developmental physiology

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between blastocyst morphology and chromosomal status in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) programs, given that a significant portion of morphologically highquality embryos can be aneuploid and that existing literature presents contradictory findings on this correlation. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at «Plusmed» Medical Center (Uzhhorod, Ukraine) from January 2023 to March 2025. The results of 43 PGT-A cycles were analyzed, during which 164 blastocysts were biopsied. Embryos were classified into three quality groups (good, fair, and poor) based on Inner Cell Mass (ICM) and Trophectoderm (TE) grades. Euploidy rates were compared across quality groups and stratified by two female age groups (≤35 and >35 years). Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association and adjust for potential confounders (maternal age, BMI, duration of infertility, etc.). The overall euploidy rate among 160 analyzed blastocysts was 41.25%, with an aneuploidy rate of 46.88%. A clear positive correlation was established between morphological quality and the probability of euploidy (p < 0.001). Blastocysts of good (65.22%) and fair (55.32%) morphology showed significantly higher euploidy rates compared to those of poor morphology (27.78%). The odds of being euploid were 2.9 times higher for good-quality (OR=2.900) and 1.8 times higher for fair-quality (OR=1.828) embryos compared to poor-quality embryos. This trend persisted in both age groups: in women ≤35 years (Good 71.43%, Fair 56.67%, Poor 28.81%) and in women >35 years (Good 55.56%, Fair 52.94%, Poor 25.81%). A significant nonlinear correlation (R²=0.9342) was also observed between increasing female age and the decreasing likelihood of obtaining euploid embryos. Blastocyst morphology may serve as an important, independent predictor of chromosomal status. Embryos with low morphological scores are characterized by a significantly reduced euploidy rate. However, as a notable portion of aneuploid embryos can still exhibit «good» morphology, morphological assessment is not an absolute criterion and should not be the sole selection criterion for embryo transfer.

References

ALFARAWATI, S., FRAGOULI E., COLLS, P., STEVENS, J., GUTIÉRREZ-MATEO, C., SCHOOLCRAFT, W.B., KATZ-JAFFE, M.G., WELLS, D. (2011) The Relationship Between Blastocyst Morphology, Chromosomal Abnormality, and Embryo Gender. Fertility and Sterility, 95(2), 520–4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.003

CAPALBO, A., RIENZI, L., CIMADOMO, D., MAGGIULLI, R., ELLIOTT, T., WRIGHT, G., NAGY, Z. P., UBALDI, F. M. (2014) Correlation Between Standard Blastocyst Morphology, Euploidy and Implantation: An Observational Study in Two Centers Involving 956 Screened Blastocysts. Human Reproduction, 29(6), 1173–81. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu033

GARDNER, D . K ., SURREY, E ., MINJAREZ, D ., LEITZ, A., STEVENS, J ., SCHOOLCRAFT, W. B. (2004) Single Blastocyst Transfer: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Fertility and Sterility, 81(3), 551–5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.07.023

HARPER, J. C., WILTON, L., TRAEGER-SYNODINOS, J., GOOSSENS, V., MOUTOU, C., SENGUPTA, S. B., PEHLIVAN BUDAK, T., RENWICK, P., DE RYCKE, M., GERAEDTS, J. P. M ., HARTON G. (2012) The ESHRE PGD Consortium: 10 Years of Data Collection. Human Reproduction, 18(3), 234–47. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr052

KATO, K . A . B ., UENO, S . A ., YABUUCHI, A . A ., UCHIYAMA, K. A, OKUNO, T. A ., KOBAYASHI, T. A ., SEGAWA, T. C ., TERAMOTO, S. C . (2014) Women’s Age and Embryo Developmental Speed Accurately Predict Clinical Pregnancy After Single Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfer. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 29, 411–6. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.06.007

KURTYAK, F. F., KURTYAK, M. F. (2023) Reproductive Technologies: Embryological Instructions. Hoverla, Uzhhorod (in Ukrainian).

KURTYAK, F. F., KURTYAK, M. F. (2024) Stimulation protocol as one of the factors of success in assisted reproductive technology programs. Proceedings of the Scientific and Practical Conference «Topical Issues of Clinical Medicine». November 29, 2024, Mukachevo, Ukraine, P. 38–40 (in Ukrainian).

KURTYAK, F. F., REPETYLO, A. O., KURTYAK, M. F., BALYUK, K. L. ( 2023) Embryonic aneuploidy in assisted reproductive technology programs as a function of woman's age. Proceedings of the 77th Final Conference of the Faculty of SHEI «USU». Series «Biology», V. I . February 28, 2023, Uzhhorod. SHEI «USU», Uzhhorod, P. 35–36 (in Ukrainian).

LI, N ., GUAN, Y ., REN, B ., ZHANG, Y ., DU, Y ., KONG, H ., ZHANG, Y ., LOU, H . (2022) Effect of Blastocyst Morphology and Developmental Rate on Euploidy and Live Birth Rates in Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Cycles With Single-Embryo Transfer. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 13, 858042. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.858042

LOU, H., LI, N., GUAN, Y., ZHANG, Y., HAO, D., CUI, S. (2021) Association Between Morphologic Grading and Implantation Rate of Euploid Blastocyst. Journal of Ovarian Research, 14(1), 18–26. doi: 10.1186/s13048-021-00770-8.

MACKLON, N., GERAEDTS, J., FAUSER, B. (2002) Conception to Ongoing Pregnancy: The 'Black Box' of Early Pregnancy Loss. Human Reproduction, 8(4), 333–43. doi: 10.1093/humupd/8.4.333

MINASI, M. G., COLASANTE, A., RICCIO, T., RUBERTI, A., CASCIANI, V., SCARSELLI, F., SPINELLA, F., FIORENTINO, F., VARRICCHIO, M. T., GRECO E. (2016) Correlation Between

Aneuploidy, Standard Morphology Evaluation and Morphokinetic Development in 1730 Biopsied Blastocysts: A Consecutive Case Series Study. Human Reproduction, 31(10), 2245–54. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew183

MUNNÉ, S., KAPLAN, B., FRATTARELLI, J. L., CHILD, T., NAKHUDA, G., SHAMMA, F. N ., SILVERBERG, K., KALISTA, T., HANDYSIDE, A. H., KATZ-JAFFE, M., WELLS, D., GORDON, T., STOCK-MYER, S., WILLMAN, S., STAR STUDY GROUP (2019) Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Versus Morphology as Selection Criteria for Single Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer in Good-Prognosis Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Fertility and Sterility, 112(6), 1071–79. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346

RUBIO, C., BELLVER, J., RODRIGO, L., CASTILLÓN, G., GUILLÉN, A., VIDAL, C., GILES, J., FERRANDO, M., CABANILLAS, S., REMOHÍ, J., PELLICER, A., SIMÓN, C. (2017) In Vitro Fertilization With Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Aneuploidies in Advanced Maternal Age: A Randomized, Controlled Study. Fertility and Sterility, 107(5), 1122–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.011

STEINER, A . Z ., JUKIC, A. M. (2016) Impact of Female Age and Nulligravidity on Fecundity in an Older Reproductive Age Cohort. Fertility and Sterility, 105(6), 1584–8 e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.028

SUNDERAM, S . K . D, CRAWFORD, S . B ., FOLGER, S. G., JAMIESON, D. J., WARNER, L. (2015) Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance – United States, 2012. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 64, 1–29. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6411a1

YAN, J., QIN, Y., ZHAO, H., SUN, Y., GONG, F., LI, R., SUN, X., LING, X., LI, H., HAO, C., TAN, J., YANG, J., ZHU, Y., LIU, F., CHEN, D., WEI, D., LU, J., NI, T., ZHOU, W., WU, K., GAO, Y., SHI, Y., LU, Y., ZHANG, T., W U, W ., MA, X., MA, H., FU, J., ZHANG, J., MENG, Q., ZHANG, H., LEGRO, R.S., CHEN, Z.-J. (2021) Live Birth With or Without Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy. The New England Journal of Medicine, 385(22), 2047–58. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2103613

ZIMMERMAN, R. S ., TAO, X., MARIN, D., WERNER, M. D., HONG, K. H., LONCZAK, A., LANDIS, J., TAYLOR, D., ZHAN, Y., SCOTT, R. T . J r., TREFF, N. R. (2018) Preclinical Validation of a Targeted Next Generation Sequencing-Based Comprehensive Chromosome Screening Methodology in Human Blastocysts. Molecular Human Reproduction, 24(1), 37–45. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gax060

Published

2025-11-17