On the issue of the accuracy regarding intraoral photogrammetry technology: an analysis of relevant evidence base data

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-7684/2025-2-6

Keywords:

intraoral scanning, photogrammetry, dental implants, edentulous, edentulous jaws, accuracy, dental rehabilitation, prosthetic constructions

Abstract

Introduction. Considering recent introduction of intraoral photogrammetry technology into dental practice, it is advisable to conduct a general analysis of the results obtained from the first laboratory and clinical studies, processing of which will allow to objectify the accuracy indicators for this method, the advantages of its application and aspects that require further detailing, all of which will impact the request for future applied and experimental research works of an approbatory nature.Objective of the research. To conduct a comparative analysis on the accuracy indicators of intraoral photogrammetry technology used for the registration of dental implants coordinate position based on the results of previous laboratory and clinical studies.Materials and methods. Collection of publications for conducting a targeted literature review was carried out by initial search of such through the Google Scholar service (https://scholar.google.com/). The following keywords were used for the search request: «intraoral photogrammetry», «dental implant», «intraoral scanner», «trueness», «precision». Scientific works published in English were taken into account, as well as those presented in periodical scientific journals indexed within the scientometric databases of Scopus and/or Web of Science.Results and discussions. The technology of intraoral photogrammetry in terms of implementation methodology is not completely analogous to the technology of classical photogrammetry, since it represents somewhat of «photogrammetric algorithm» for matching the positions of coordinate points present over specific scan abutments using artificial intelligence’s reconstructive and comparative approaches for such matter, and not the actual simultaneous registration of the position of all scan markers by an extraoral device from a distance and/or projections at which their photofixation occurs according to the «single frame» principle. Available laboratory and clinical studies demonstrated that the accuracy of the intraoral photogrammetry method is comparative to extraoral photogrammetry methods, and that the accuracy of the intraoral photogrammetry technology is higher in comparison with various technologies of intraoral scanning in means of registering objectified positions of dental implants within edentulous jaws.Conclusions. Considering available literature data it may be resumed that the accuracy of the intraoral photogrammetry technology for the objective registration of the dental implants’ coordinate position within the structure of the edentulous upper or lower jaw (model) is higher than the accuracy of various intraoral scanning technologies, which are not combined with photogrammetry technology, but may be used for the same purpose. The indicators of trueness and precision of the intraoral photogrammetry technology are comparable to similar parameters of some extraoral photogrammetry systems. The validity of the AI-based photogrammetric matching algorithm when using such with field of view equaled to the window’s size of scanner tip, which is significantly smaller than the size of the actual prosthetic field, requires further clarification in future standardized clinical studies.

References

Revilla‐León M, Gómez‐Polo M, Rutkunas V, Ntovas P, Kois JC. Classification of Complete‐Arch Implant Scanning Techniques Recorded by Using Intraoral Scanners. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2025 Jan;37(1):236-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13322

Revilla‐León M, Kois JC. Implant Scanning Workflows for Fabricating Implant‐Supported Prostheses Recorded by Using Intraoral Scanners With or Without Photogrammetry Technologies. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13431

Hussein MO. Photogrammetry technology in implant dentistry: A systematic review. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2023 Sep 1;130(3):318-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.015

Joensahakij N, Serichetaphongse P, Chengprapakorn W. The accuracy of conventional versus digital (intraoral scanner or photogrammetry) impression techniques in full-arch implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review. Evidence-Based Dentistry. 2024 Aug 12:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01045-z

Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Drone M, Barmak AB, Guinot-Barona C, Att W, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA. Impact of scanning distance on the accuracy of a photogrammetry system. Journal of dentistry. 2024 Mar 1;142:104854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104854

Ma B, Yue X, Sun Y, Peng L, Geng W. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Dec;21:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-02005-0

Ribeiro P, Díaz-Castro CM, Ríos-Carrasco B, Ríos-Santos JV, Herrero-Climent M. Stereo-photogrammetry for impression of full-arch fixed dental prosthesis–an update of the reviews. Prosthesis. 2024 Aug 15;6(4):939-51. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis6040068

Revilla-León M, Att W, Özcan M, Rubenstein J. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2021;125(3):470-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.005

Brakoč J, Todorović A, Mangano FG, Glišić M, Šćepanović M. Accuracy of intraoral photogrammetry versus direct digital implant impressions in the fully edentulous lower jaw: An in vitro study. Journal of Dentistry. 2025 May 1;156:105654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105654

Eldabe AK, Adel-Khattab D, Botros KH. Accuracy of intraoral photogrammetry in complete arch digital implant scanning: An in vivo prospective comparative study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2025 Apr 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.03.041

Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Drone M, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA. Accuracy of complete arch implant scans recorded by using intraoral and extraoral photogrammetry systems. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2025 Feb 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.01.041

Nulty AB. An In Vivo Comparison of Trueness and Precision of Two Novel Methods for Improving Edentulous Full Arch Implant Scanning Accuracy: A Pilot Study. Dentistry Journal. 2024 Nov 18;12(11):367. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12110367

SHINING 3d dental. Available from: https://www.shining3ddental.com/solution/aoralscan-elite/

Shining 3D Aoralscan Elite Review by iDD: Available from: /https://instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/intraoral-scanner-reviews/shining-3d-aoralscan-elite-review-does-intraoral-photogrammetry-really-work/?srsltid=AfmBOoq_WUPS9bxflCpuuFTJDbWef8_QxsEXDFjJZUeUfymAXB9DbNfI

Estibalez-Recasens M, Serrano-Granger C, Santamaría-Laorden A, Andreu-Vázquez C, Orejas-Pérez J. Precision of stereophotogrammetry in complete arch implant recordings: A clinical study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2025 Jan 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.12.021

Gómez‐Polo M, Barmak AB, Ortega R, Rutkunas V, Kois JC, Revilla‐León M. Accuracy, scanning time, and patient satisfaction of stereophotogrammetry systems for acquiring 3D dental implant positions: a systematic review. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2023 Dec;32(S2):208-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13751

Revilla-León M, Barmak AB, Drone M, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA. Capturing complete arch implant positions in two partial photogrammetry scans: Does it impact the accuracy of complete arch implant scans?. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.:S0022-3913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.01.041

Goncharuk-Khomyn M., Tukalo I, Sheveria S., Rak Y, Liakh A. Experience of using photogrammetry method in modern implantological practice (literature review). Modern Medicine, Pharmacy and Psychological Health. 2023; (5(14):72-80. https://doi.org/10.32689/2663-0672-2023-5-13

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Section

DENTISTRY