CONSERVATION OF RARE AND PROTECTED PLANT SPECIES UNDER A STRICT NON-INTERVENTION REGIME: PROBLEMS AND POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS (A CASE STUDY OF THE KANIV NATURE RESERVE)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/1998-6475.2026.60.19

Keywords:

absolutely protected areas, protection of plant species, population management, legislation

Abstract

The successions caused by protecting natural areas that occur in absolutely protected areas lead to various-scale and various-qualitative changes in forest, steppe, meadow, and swamp vegetation. The results of this process quite often contradict many of the objectives of nature reserves. In particular, when monitoring populations of protected vascular plant species in the Kaniv Nature Reserve facts of the disappearance of their individual populations were detected. The most vulnerable populations are represented by single individuals (Cephalanthera rubra, Huperzia selago), which are among the first to disappear. Due to the change of sparse shrub vegetation to shady forest plant communities, the reduction of illumination of the lower layers of the ecosystem, and a radical change in soil and hydrological conditions of habitats, populations of three species (Dactylorhiza incarnata, Liparis loeselii, Neottia ovata) disappeared in one of the sites. Due to the growth of Amorpha fruticosa, the local population of Anacamptis palustris. Chase was completely eliminated. It can be proposed the definition of conservation priorities for different areas within nature reserves and, the development of various management measures. Quite effective measures for the management of these areas include adequate regulatory impacts on habitats (cutting down woody vegetation with subsequent mowing, mechanical removal of invasive species, scientifically based, regulated, limited grazing of livestock in developed lands and the natural lands (grasslands) of protected areas, dissemination of thickened self-seeding of rare and protected plant species in habitats suitable for their further development, timely transfer of part of the population to habitats suitable for their long-term growth). At the same time, working with species included in the Red Data Book of Ukraine according to the procedure established by the Law requires the need for permits from the government based on the decision of the National Committee on the Red Data Book of Ukraine. In practice, this approach significantly slows down the implementation of relevant work and blocks the possibility of any timely initiative on the ground. In this regard, it is obvious that amendments to the Law of Ukraine "On the Nature Reserve Fund" are needed to grant possibilities to the administrations of the protected areas to apply active forms of plant protection, including the repatriation of their populations.

References

DIDUKH, Ya.P. (2011) The ecological scales for the species of Ukrainian flora and their use in synphytoindication. Phytosociocentre, Kyiv.

DUBYNA D.V., USTYMENKO P.M. (2015) Kliuchovi terytorii perspektyvnoi ekomerezhi Lisostepu Ukrainy: osnovni zahrozy rarytetnii fitotsenoriznomanitnosti [Key areas of perspective ecological network in Forest-Steppe of Ukraine: the main threats to rare phytocenodiversity]. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 72(4), 303–309. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj72.04.303

KAGALO A.A., SYTSCHAK N.N., OMELCHUK O.S. (2022) Repatriatsiia ta reintroduktsiia okhoroniuvanykh vydiv roslyn – chy ne vystelena "dobrymy" namiramy doroha do pekla? [Repatriation and reintroduction of protected plant species – is the road to hell paved with these good intentions?]. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 79(2), 114–119. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj79.02.114

KOZHEVNYKOV H. A. (1992) O nieobkhodimosti ustroistva zapoviednykh uchastkov dlia okhrany russkoi prirody [On the need to establish protected areas for the protection of Russian nature]. Okhota i okhrana prirody, 1, 135-147. (in Russian)

LIUBCHENKO V.M. (1980) Novi mistsezrostannia ridkisnykh orkhidnykh u Serednomu Prydniprovii [New rare orchid habitats in the Middle Prydniprovia]. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 37(1), 95–96. (in Ukrainian)

LIUBCHENKO V.M., BAKALYNA L.V., VOITIUK Yu.O., SHEVCHYK V.L. (1991) Stan okhorony vydiv roslyn, zanesenykh do Chervonykh knyh u Kanivskomu derzhavnomu zapovidnyku [The state of conservation of plant species listed in the Red data books in the Kaniv State Reserve]. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 48(1), 79–83. (in Ukrainian)

LYSENKO H.M. (2009) Zminy velychyn edafichnykh faktoriv “Striletskoho stepu” pid vplyvom riznykh rezhymiv zapovidannia [Effects of different conservational regimes on edaphic factors changes in “Striletskiy step” reserve]. Chornomorski botanical journal, 5(3), 416–426. (in Ukrainian)

MORA C., SALE P. (2011) Ongoing global biodiversity loss and the need to move beyond protected areas: A review of the technical and practical shortcomings of protected areas on land and sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 434, 251-266. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09214

NITSCH H., OSTERBURG B., ROGGENDORF W., LAGGNER B. (2012) Cross compliance and the protection of grassland – Illustrative analyses of land use transitions between permanent grassland and arable land in German regions. Land Use Policy, 29, 440–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.09.001

OKHRIMENKO S.H., SHELEHEDA O.R., TKACH YE.D. (2019) Rezervatohenni suktsesii psamofitnoho stepu ostrova Khortytsia [Reservatogenic successions of the psammophyte steppe on the island of Khortytsia]. Agroecological journal, 1, 90–96. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.33730/2077-4893.1.2019.163270

ONYSHCHENKO V.A. (1999) Sozolohichnyi priorytet yak osnova rezhymu pryrodno-zapovidnykh terytorii [Sozological priority as the basis of the regime of nature reserves]. Nature reserves in Ukraine at the turn of the millennium (current status, problems and development strategy). Proceedings of the All-Ukrainian General Theoretical and Scientific-Practical Conference. Kaniv, Ukraine, October 11-14, 1999, pp. 17–20. (in Ukrainian)

PRO PRYRODNO-ZAPOVIDNYI FOND UKRAINY: Zakon Ukrainy vid 16.06.1992 №2456-XII, stanom na 10.02.2026. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2456-12#Text

SHEVCHYK V.L. (1995) Osoblyvosti florystychnykh kompleksiv trokh terasovykh rivniv r. Dnipro v mezhakh Kanivskoho zapovidnyka [Peculiarities of floristic complexes of three terraced levels of the Dnipro River within the Kaniv Nature Reserve]. Zapovidna sprava v Ukraini, 1, 4-6. (in Ukrainian)

SHEVCHYK V.L. (2012) Kanivskyi pryrodnyi zapovidnyk [Kaniv Nature Reserve]. Fitoriznomanittia zapovidnykiv i natsionalnykh pryrodnykh parkiv Ukrainy. Vol. 1. Biosferni zapovidnyky. Pryrodni zapovidnyky. Fitosotsiotsentr, Kyiv, pp. 151-170. (in Ukrainian)

SHEVCHYK V.L., BAKALYNA L.V. (1997) Unikalne mistsezrostannia ridkisnykh vydiv roslyn na Zmiinykh ostrovakh (Kanivskyi pryrodnyi zapovidnyk, Ukraina) [The unique habitat of rare plant species on the Zmiini Islands (Kaniv Nature Reserve, Ukraine)]. Nature Reserves in Ukraine, 3(1), 20–22 (in Ukrainian)

TKACHENKO V.S., HENOV A.P. (1988) Rezervatni zminy roslynnosti na absoliutno zapovidnii diliantsi Khomutovskoho stepu (URSR) [Reserve vegetation changes in the absolutely protected area of the Khomutovs'kyi Steppe reserve]. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 45(4), 27–32. (in Ukrainian)

USTYMENKO P.M., POPOVYCH S.YU., DUBYNA D.V. (2019) Suchasni tendentsii dynamiky rarytetnykh fitotsenoziv Ukrainy ta zmina paradyhmy absoliutnoi zapovidnosti [Current trends in the dynamics of rare phytocoenoses in Ukraine and modification of the concept of absolute conservation]. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 76(5), 434–444. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj76.05.434

Published

2026-05-29