SUBSTANTIATION OF THE DEPENDENCE OF THE PROCESSES OF REPARATIVE REGENERATION OF THE MANDIBULAR BONE TISSUE ON THE DIAMETER OF THE BONE SUBSTITUTE GRANULES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-7684/2025-3-9Keywords:
dental implantation, tooth extraction, bone tissue, alveolar process augmentation, reparative osteogenesisAbstract
Introduction. Alveolar bone atrophy is one of the problems of dental rehabilitation using dental implants. Alveolar process deficiency, which occurs as a result of atrophy, is a significant problem when installing dental implants, as it prevents the achievement of sufficient primary stability, which is a decisive factor in the success of implantation. There are various methods of vertical bone augmentation, such as directed bone regeneration, alveolar distraction osteogenesis and autogenous bone transplantation, etc. The aim of the study was to substantiate the effectiveness of the use of bone substitute granules in dental augmentation depending on the type of bone tissue. The clinical study was conducted on the basis of the surgical department of the Sumy Regional Clinical Dental Polyclinic. The study involved 75 patients who underwent lower molar extraction followed by dental implantation. Analyzing the sections of patients’ computed tomograms, we concluded that the most common (57–60%) cases are the compensated phase of this pathology in the conditions of type 1 or 2 bone tissue, the subcompensated phase was somewhat less common (35–39%); in its presence, type 2 bone was found in 44% of cases, and type 3 in 56% of cases, respectively. The most unfavorable conditions for delayed dental implantation are the presence of the decompensated phase of this pathology, which in 77–80% of cases is visualized in the presence of type 4 bone. Conclusions. It has been established that the 0.5–1.0 mm bone substitute granules have the properties of “ideal elasticity”, which is called spherical isotropy and its deformation properties are described as an arithmetic linear relationship between the stress force and the direction and degree of deformation. We have established that spherical isotropy has the same biomechanical properties in all directions, arising from each point of the material and each part of it leads to the same parameters of the increase in load, which is included in the concept of “isotropy”.
References
Alghamdi HS, Jansen JA. The development and future of dental implants. Dent Mater J. 2020 Mar 31; 39 (2): 167–172. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2019-140.
Smeets R, Stadlinger B, Schwarz F, Beck-Broichsitter B, Jung O, Precht C, Kloss F, Gröbe A, Heiland M, Ebker T. Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016: 6285620. DOI: 10.1155/2016/6285620
Schwarze UY, Strauss FJ, Gruber R. Caspase inhibitor attenuates the shape changes in the alveolar ridge following tooth extraction: A pilot study in rats. J Periodontal Res. 2021 Jan; 56 (1): 101–107. DOI: 10.1111/jre.12798.
Khattou VV, Ivanytska OS, Havryliev VM, Buhanchenko OP, Boyko IV, Lokes KP, Avetikov DS. Dynamics of bone formation and osteoresorption markers in patients with postoperative mandibular bone defects. World of Medicine and Biology. 2023; 19 (86): 167–170. DOI 10.26724/2079-8334-2023-4-86-167-170.
MacBeth ND, Donos N, Mardas N. Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration or socket seal technique. A randomised, single-blind controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Jul; 33 (7): 681–699. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13933.
Avetikov DS, Pronina OM, Lokes KP, Bukhanchenko OP. Suchasni uyavlennya pro umovy, shcho obmezhuyut vybir metodu implantatsiyi zubiv u verkhniy i nyzhniy shchelepakh. Visnyk problem biolohiyi ta medytsyny. 2017; 4 (3): 20–27. DOI: 10.29254/2077-4214-2017-4-3-141-20-27
Lodi G, Azzi L, Varoni EM, Pentenero M, Del Fabbro M, Carrassi A, Sardella A, Manfredi M. Antibiotics to prevent complications following tooth extractions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 24; 2 (2): CD003811. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003811.pub3.
Toledano-Serrabona J, Sánchez-Garcés MÁ, Sánchez-Torres A, Gay-Escoda C. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant treatments of the vertical bone atrophy: A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Jan 1; 24 (1): e70–e75. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.22750.
Vaquette C, Mitchell J, Ivanovski S. Recent Advances in Vertical Alveolar Bone Augmentation Using Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Feb 7; 9: 798393. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.798393.
Wang SH, Hsu JT, Fuh LJ, Peng SL, Huang HL, Tsai MT. New classification for bone type at dental implant sites: a dental computed tomography study. BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 25; 23 (1): 324. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03039-2.
Kolesnichenko MO, Savchenko DV, Savchenko VV, Ivaniuk OS, Zhyvotovskyi IV, Yacenko PI, Lokes KP. Dynamics of changes in biochemical markers of blood serum after removal of mandibular molars and augmentation of the alveolar process. World of Medicine and Biology. 2023; 1 (83): 96–9. DOI: 10.26724/2079-8334-2023-1-83-96-99
Kong ZL, Wang GG, Liu XY, Ye ZY, Xu DQ, Ding X. Influence of bone anatomical morphology of mandibular molars on dental implant based on CBCT. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Oct 15; 21 (1): 528. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01888-3.
Afrashtehfar KI, Assery NM, Alblooshi KAK, Schmidlin PR. Maintaining periodontally compromised teeth seems more cost-effective than replacing them with dental implants. Evid Based Dent. 2024 Sep; 25 (3): 129–130. DOI: 10.1038/s41432-024-01050-2.







