CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL TESTING OF SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHODS IDENTIFICATION OF ADHESIVE SYSTEMS IN FORENSIC DENTISTRY
Keywords:
identification of adhesive systems, forensic dentistry, spectrophotometric method, light spectroscopyAbstract
In modern dental industry has not been fully resolved is the assessment of the quality of dental care. Given the high prevalence of caries (61-96%), basic dental procedures is filling cavities by fotocomposite materials, which in turn makes use of adhesive systems. But, including epidemiological studies and high level of appeals patients complaining of poor dental fillings, one of the reasons of the use of adhesive systems are poor quality, there is a pressing question in respect of the identification of adhesive manufacturers.Development of spectrophotometric methods for the identification of adhesive systems to study the evidence base in dentistry and forensic medicine. Conducted laboratory tests found that the adhesive spectrophotometric method of identification V-VII generations can transmiss and absorb light waves in the range (400-700 nm.) are significant.
References
Виллерсхаузен, Б. Актуальное определение места стоматологических пломбировочных композитов / Б. Виллерсхаузен, К. Эрнст // Клиническая стоматология. 2003-3, № 3.- С. 10-21.
Луцкая, И. К. Эстетическая стоматология / И. К. Луцкая. Минск : Бел. Наука, 2000. С. 246.
Николаев, А. И. Практическая терапевтическая стоматология / А. И. Николаев, Л. М. Цепов. СПБ. : Санкт-Петербургский институт стоматологии, 2001. 390 с.
Moll, K. Bond strength of adhesive/composite combinations to dentin involving total-and selfetching adhesives / K. Moll, H. Park, B. Haller // The Journal of adhesive dentistry. 2002. Vol. 4. № 3. P. 171–180.
Pashley, D. H. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II.Etching effects on unground enamel / D. H. Pashley, F. R. Tay // Dent. Mat. 2001. Vol. 17.P. 430–444
Perdigao, J. Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive. Effect on postoperative sensitivity/ J. Perdigao, S. Geraldeli, J. Hodges // JADA, 2003. Vol. 134. Р. 1621–1629.
Resin-enamel bonds made with self-etching primers on ground enamel / M. Hashimoto[at al.] // European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2003. Vol. 111. № 5. P. 447–453.
Tani, C. Effect of smear layer thickness on bond strength mediated by three all-inoneselfetching priming adhesives / C. Tani, W. J. Finger // J. Adhes. Dent. 2002. Vol. 4.P. 283–289.
Tay, F. Dental adhesives of the future / F. Tay, D. Pashley // J. Adhesive Dent.2002. Vol. 4. № 2. P. 105–115.
Tay, F. Have Dentin Adhesives Become Too Hydrophilic? / F. Tay, D. Pashley //J. Can. Dent. Assoc. 2003. Vol. 69. № 11. P. 726–731.
Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemicalcured or dual-cured composites. Part II. Single-bottle, total-etch adhesive / F. R.Tay [at al.] // J. Adhes. Dent. 2003. Vol. 5. № 4. P. 91–106.
Microtensile bond strength of a total-etch 3-step, total-etch 2-step, self-etch 2-step,and a selfetch 1-step dentin bonding system through 15-month water storage / S. R.Armstrong [at al.] // J. Adhes Dent. 2003. № 5. P. 47–56
