Peer-review process

Position on reviewing of scientific journal
"Intermedical journal"

1.1. The scientific articles submitted to the editorial office of the scientific journal "Intermedical journal" undergo a review process (with the provision of the anonymity of the reviewer's person).

1.2. The reviewer's questionnaire highlights the following questions:

• Having a conflicting interest in the reviewer?
• The originality of the text?
• Does the title of the article correspond to the content?
• Does the abstract contain the content of the article?
• The relevance of the article is disclosed in sufficient quantity?
• Is the connection between the problem posed in the article and the important scientific or practical tasks justified?
• Are the articles in the article consistent with the problem that the author considers?
• The findings are based on a theoretical analysis and / or experimental results?
• Is there a need to change the scope of the article?
• Is sufficient justification of the scientific results obtained?
• The findings are consistent with the content of the article?
• An analysis of the prospects for further research in the article is a scientific style?
• Linguistic literacy of the article.

1.3. The reviewer reserves the right to reject an article that does not meet the requirements or subject matter of the publication.

1.4. An article, not recommended by the reviewer prior to publication, is not accepted for re-examination.

1.5. Subject to a positive review, the reviewer informs the editorial board, which makes the final decision. The article approved for publication is polished by technical and literary editors. Editors reserve the right to make minor stylistic, spelling, and technical alterations that do not affect the article content without the author’s consent..